Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing stratification for survival analyses across standardized data sources.

BMC medical informatics and decision making·2026
Same author

Effect of subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa therapy on non-motor symptoms in advanced PD patients.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Supporting Risk Assessment Through a Visual, Browser-Based Tool.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Time dependent outcomes modeling in a real-world analysis of the molecular tumor board at University Cancer Center Hamburg (2016-2022).

The oncologist·2026
Same author

A comprehensive European Colorectal Cancer Cohort dataset.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

The Knowledge Connector decision support system for multiomics-based precision oncology.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

7.6K

Improving Eye-Tracking Data Quality: A Framework for Reproducible Evaluation of Detection Algorithms.

Christopher Gundler1, Matthias Temmen2, Alessandro Gulberti3

  • 1Institute for Applied Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|May 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Researchers can now easily select the best eye-tracking algorithms for their studies. This framework compares 13 advanced methods, improving data quality in behavioral science and medicine.

Keywords:
detection qualityeye-trackingmethodological frameworkpupil detection algorithm

More Related Videos

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
10:43

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Published on: June 10, 2021

5.3K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering Electrical Networks Behind Complex Brain Activities and Disorders
05:49

Author Spotlight: Deciphering Electrical Networks Behind Complex Brain Activities and Disorders

Published on: November 1, 2024

774

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

7.6K
Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
10:43

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Published on: June 10, 2021

5.3K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering Electrical Networks Behind Complex Brain Activities and Disorders
05:49

Author Spotlight: Deciphering Electrical Networks Behind Complex Brain Activities and Disorders

Published on: November 1, 2024

774

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • High-quality eye-tracking data are essential for research in behavioral sciences and medicine.
  • Selecting the optimal eye-tracking algorithm can be challenging despite extensive literature review.
  • Applied researchers need guidance to choose the most suitable algorithm for their specific project needs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a framework for systematically assessing and comparing state-of-the-art eye-tracking algorithms.
  • To empower researchers by enabling them to select the best-fitting algorithm for their unique research setup.
  • To increase the number of usable algorithms within a single software package, facilitating broader application.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a unified application interface to assess 13 state-of-the-art eye-tracking algorithms.
  • Systematic comparison of algorithm effectiveness through the developed framework.
  • Validation of the framework using retrospective data to confirm its suitability for algorithm selection.

Main Results:

  • The framework successfully integrates and allows comparison of 13 advanced eye-tracking algorithms, more than doubling the currently available options in a single package.
  • Validation confirmed the framework's effectiveness in guiding algorithm selection for specific scientific contexts.
  • A detailed and reproducible workflow was established for practical application.

Conclusions:

  • The developed framework significantly aids researchers in choosing the most appropriate eye-tracking algorithm.
  • This tool enhances the quality of scientific data by facilitating informed algorithm selection.
  • The study contributes to improved reproducibility and data integrity in eye-tracking research.