Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Typical Model Studies01:30

Typical Model Studies

356
Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
356
Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers01:08

Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers

2.2K
Step growth polymerization involves bi or multifunctional monomers. Bifunctional monomers react to form linear step growth polymers, whereas multifunctional monomers react to form non-linear or branched polymers.
As the step-growth polymerization involves step-wise condensation of monomers, the molecular weight also builds up eventually. Consequently, high molecular weight polymers are obtained at the late stages of the polymerization, where 99% of monomers have been consumed.
The extent of the...
2.2K
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

230
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
230
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

125
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
125

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-temperature and high-salinity performance of chelating agents for oilfield scale inhibition with dynamic scale loop.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Parametric Investigation of Fluid Migration in Casing-Liner Cement Sheaths and Microannulus Using Computational Fluid Modeling.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Artificial neural network (ANN) based prediction of proppant settling in horizontal wellbores during hydraulic fracturing.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Compatibility of Diammonium Phosphate (DAP) with Fracturing Fluid Systems for Deep Consolidation of Carbonate Rocks.

ACS omega·2025
Same author

Application of Polymers in Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids: A Review.

Polymers·2025
Same author

Potential Advances in the Design of Sealants for Geologic Conformance Control toward CO<sub>2</sub> Storage Security.

ACS omega·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials
06:07

Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials

Published on: April 25, 2019

12.6K

Prediction of Foam Rheology Models Parameters Utilizing Machine Learning Tools.

Jawad Al-Darweesh1, Murtada Saleh Aljawad1,2, Zeeshan Tariq3

  • 1College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dharahan 31261, Saudi Arabia.

ACS Omega
|May 13, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study uses machine learning to predict foamed fluid viscosity, finding the XGBoost model accurately determines rheological model constants. This approach reduces experimental costs for viscosity measurements.

More Related Videos

Microfluidic Devices for Characterizing Pore-scale Event Processes in Porous Media for Oil Recovery Applications
08:38

Microfluidic Devices for Characterizing Pore-scale Event Processes in Porous Media for Oil Recovery Applications

Published on: January 16, 2018

10.4K
Calibration Procedures for Orthogonal Superposition Rheology
08:43

Calibration Procedures for Orthogonal Superposition Rheology

Published on: November 18, 2020

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials
06:07

Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials

Published on: April 25, 2019

12.6K
Microfluidic Devices for Characterizing Pore-scale Event Processes in Porous Media for Oil Recovery Applications
08:38

Microfluidic Devices for Characterizing Pore-scale Event Processes in Porous Media for Oil Recovery Applications

Published on: January 16, 2018

10.4K
Calibration Procedures for Orthogonal Superposition Rheology
08:43

Calibration Procedures for Orthogonal Superposition Rheology

Published on: November 18, 2020

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Rheology and materials science
  • Computational modeling and simulation
  • Chemical engineering

Background:

  • Predicting foamed fluid viscosity traditionally relies on rheological models, but determining model constants experimentally under diverse conditions is complex.
  • Foam rheology is influenced by numerous factors including shear rate, temperature, pressure, surfactant type, gas phase composition, and salinity.
  • Accurate rheological characterization is crucial for optimizing processes involving foamed fluids.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of various parameters on foam rheology.
  • To develop and evaluate machine learning models for predicting rheological model constants.
  • To identify the most effective machine learning technique for this predictive task.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental measurements of foam rheology using a high-pressure, high-temperature rheometer.
  • Fitting experimental data to established rheological models (Power-law, Bingham plastic, Casson).
  • Application and comparison of seven machine learning techniques (Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, etc.) to predict model constants.

Main Results:

  • The Casson fluid model effectively described the foam's rheological behavior.
  • The XGBoost (XGB) machine learning model demonstrated superior performance in predicting rheological constants, achieving 95% accuracy under optimal conditions.
  • Pearson's correlation analysis indicated that XGBoost utilizes most features significantly for predictions, unlike other models.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning, particularly XGBoost, offers a robust and cost-effective method for predicting foamed fluid rheological constants.
  • The developed methodology can significantly reduce the experimental effort required for rheological parameter determination.
  • This approach provides a valuable tool for rapid assessment and optimization in applications involving foamed fluids.