Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
State-Specific Coupled-Cluster Methods for Excited States
Yann Damour1, Anthony Scemama1, Denis Jacquemin2,3
1Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique Quantiques (UMR 5626), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, 31000 Toulouse, France.
We evaluated the ΔCCSD method for calculating molecular excited states, finding it effective for doubly excited states but generally less accurate than EOM-CCSD for other types. State-specific orbitals offered minor improvements.
Area of Science:
- Quantum Chemistry
- Computational Chemistry
- Theoretical Chemistry
Background:
- The standard Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster with Single and Double excitations (EOM-CCSD) method struggles with doubly excited states.
- The ΔCCSD method, utilizing non-Aufbau determinants, offers an alternative for targeting excited states, particularly doubly excited ones.
Purpose of the Study:
- To benchmark the accuracy and consistency of the ΔCCSD method against EOM-CCSD for various types of molecular excited states.
- To assess the performance of ΔCCSD beyond doubly excited states, including doublet-doublet transitions and singly excited states of closed-shell systems.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of ΔCCSD and EOM-CCSD methods for computing excitation energies.
- Utilized a dataset of 276 excited states from the quest database.
- Employed a minimalist two-determinant coupled-cluster approach for singly excited states in closed-shell systems.
Main Results:
- ΔCCSD shows effectiveness for doubly excited states but generally underperforms EOM-CCSD for other excitation types.
- Mean absolute errors (MAEs) for doublet-doublet transitions were 0.10 eV (ΔCCSD) vs. 0.07 eV (EOM-CCSD).
- MAEs for singly excited states were 0.15 eV (ΔCCSD) vs. 0.08 eV (EOM-CCSD), with higher multiconfigurational character contributing to ΔCCSD's lower accuracy.
Conclusions:
- ΔCCSD is a viable method for doubly excited states where EOM-CCSD falters.
- For most other excited states, EOM-CCSD remains the more accurate and consistent choice.
- State-specific optimized orbitals provide marginal improvements for ΔCCSD accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
¹H NMR: Pople Notation
A proton...

