Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Fabrication and Characterization of Superconducting Resonators
Published on: May 21, 2016
Bridging Constrained Random-Phase Approximation and Linear Response Theory for Computing Hubbard Parameters
Alberto Carta1,2, Iurii Timrov2, Sophie Beck3
1ETH Zürich, Materials Theory, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Accurate screened Coulomb interaction (U) values are crucial for density-functional theory (DFT) extensions. This study compares linear response theory (LRT) and constrained random-phase approximation (cRPA), revealing key differences impacting U calculations.
Area of Science:
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Computational Materials Science
- Quantum Chemistry
Background:
- Density-functional theory (DFT) extensions like DFT+U and DFT+DMFT require accurate screened Coulomb interaction (U) values.
- The predictive power of these methods depends heavily on the reliability of the computed U parameter.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically compare the linear response theory (LRT) and constrained random-phase approximation (cRPA) methods for calculating the screened Coulomb interaction (U).
- To identify the sources of discrepancies between LRT and cRPA and to establish conditions for their agreement.
- To investigate the behavior of both methods in cases of strong hybridization and their impact on U values.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a unified computational framework employing maximally localized Wannier functions.
- Performed a systematic comparison of LRT and cRPA calculations for the screened Coulomb interaction (U).
- Analyzed the contributions of exchange-correlation potential response and excitation channels to discrepancies.
Main Results:
- Found significant differences (up to 30%) in U values calculated by LRT and cRPA, even in unambiguous cases.
- Identified the neglect of exchange-correlation potential response in cRPA and additional excitation channels in LRT as primary causes for discrepancies.
- Demonstrated that accounting for these differences leads to near-perfect agreement between LRT and cRPA.
- Observed that cRPA can yield ambiguous and unrealistically small U values in strongly hybridized systems, while LRT remains robust.
Conclusions:
- Formally connected LRT and cRPA, clarifying their respective strengths and limitations in calculating the screened Coulomb interaction (U).
- Highlighted the importance of considering the response of the exchange-correlation potential and all relevant excitation channels for accurate U calculations.
- Emphasized the necessity of using consistent Wannier orbitals for transferable U values across different computational implementations.
Related Concept Videos
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear.
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
Reaction Mechanisms: The Steady-State Approximation
Debye–Huckel–Onsager Conductance Equation
Linear Approximation in Time Domain
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length, the...
Frequency Response of a Circuit
The transfer function is pivotal in characterizing how these circuits react to various frequencies, facilitating a profound understanding of their behavior. An essential parameter is the time constant, signifying the...
