Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

The Tail Suspension Test
Published on: January 28, 2012
Lithium-discontinuation-induced treatment refractoriness revisited
Ralph Kupka1,2,3, Eline Regeer4, Annet van Bergen5
1Dept. of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Oldenaller 1, Amsterdam, 1081 HJ, Netherlands. r.kupka@amsterdamumc.nl.
Background:
Lithium is effective in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder. Concerns have been raised about non-responsiveness after discontinuation and resuming previously effective lithium prophylaxis. We reviewed the available literature on this so-called lithium-discontinuation-induced treatment refractoriness (LDITR).
Results:
We found 11 case reports and six cohort studies including 403 patients addressing LDITR, and one nation-wide register study providing some additional data on LDITR. Pooling all cohort studies, the percentages of non-responders during re-treatment with lithium ranged from 3.6 to 27.7%, with an average of 17.3%. Non-responsiveness was associated with longer duration of lithium treatment before discontinuation, longer duration of bipolar disorder before start of lithium, faster tapering off lithium, and longer duration of discontinuation.
Conclusions:
There may be a subgroup in whom lithium discontinuation-induced treatment refractoriness exists. However, the vast majority of people respond when lithium is restarted. Moreover, it may be necessary to continue lithium beyond the first relapses to restore long-term prophylactic efficacy.
Related Concept Videos
Mania and Antimanic Drugs: Overview
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Desensitization and Tachyphylaxis
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
Long-term Depression
Electroconvulsive Therapy

