Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

05:23
Author Spotlight: Noninvasive Cerebral Blood Flow Determination in Human Functional Brain Region for Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
Published on: May 31, 2024
539
Comparison between supervised and physics-informed unsupervised deep neural networks for estimating cerebral
Shota Ishida1, Yasuhiro Fujiwara2, Naoyuki Takei3
1Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyoto College of Medical Science, Nantan, Kyoto, Japan.
NMR in Biomedicine
|May 16, 2024
Summary
A new unsupervised deep neural network (DNN) accurately estimates cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial transit time (ATT) from multi-delay arterial spin labeling (ASL) data, showing improved noise immunity compared to conventional methods.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Medical Physics
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial transit time (ATT) are crucial biomarkers in neuroimaging.
- Multi-delay arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a non-invasive technique for quantifying these parameters.
- Accurate estimation of CBF and ATT is essential for diagnosing and monitoring various neurological conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and evaluate a physics-informed unsupervised deep neural network (DNN) for estimating CBF and ATT from multi-delay ASL data.
- To compare the performance of the unsupervised DNN with a supervised DNN and a conventional method.
- To assess the accuracy and noise immunity of these methods using both simulated and in vivo data.
Main Methods:
- Trained supervised and unsupervised DNNs using simulated multi-delay ASL data.
- Compared CBF and ATT estimation accuracy and noise robustness across methods using simulations.
- Evaluated performance on in vivo data and assessed noise-induced variations by adding Rician noise.
Main Results:
- Supervised DNN demonstrated unbiased CBF estimation, unlike other methods with positive bias.
- Supervised DNN showed less bias in ATT estimation, with all methods behaving similarly with increasing noise.
- In vivo studies confirmed supervised DNN yielded the most accurate CBF and ATT; unsupervised DNN offered superior noise immunity for ATT estimation.
Conclusions:
- Physics-informed unsupervised learning effectively estimates CBF and ATT from multi-delay ASL, outperforming conventional methods.
- Supervised DNN generally showed superior performance in accuracy and bias reduction.
- Unsupervised DNN demonstrated specific advantages in noise immunity for ATT estimation, highlighting its potential in challenging imaging scenarios.

