Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Whole-Body PSMA-PET/CT dataset with manually annotated tumor lesions.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Emotional modulation of statistical learning in visual search.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Editorial: Guidance of search by long-term and working memory.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

The effect of task-irrelevant objects in spatial contextual cueing.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Machine Learning-based Model for Major Adverse Cardiac Event Prediction in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging·2026
Same author

Structured reporting of B-mode, color Doppler, and CEUS in testicular tumor assessment: a reader study with urologist ratings.

BMC urology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients
07:43

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Published on: June 17, 2019

7.7K

Distributed attention beats the down-side of statistical context learning in visual search.

Artyom Zinchenko1,2, Markus Conci1,3, Johannes Hauser1,4

  • 1Department Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , Munich , Germany.

Journal of Vision
|May 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Focused attention hinders contextual cueing adaptation, while distributed attention enhances it. This suggests broad attentional sets better update spatial memories for visual search.

More Related Videos

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

11.9K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients
07:43

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Published on: June 17, 2019

7.7K
Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

11.9K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Spatial attention operates in focused or distributed modes.
  • Context-based memories, like the contextual-cueing effect, guide visual search.
  • Adaptation of these memories is crucial for efficient visual search.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how focused versus distributed attention modes impact the adaptation of context-based memories.
  • To determine the influence of attentional deployment on the contextual-cueing effect during visual search.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments compared focused attention (free eye movement) and distributed attention (central fixation).
  • Participants learned spatial layouts of distractors, followed by a test phase with target location changes.
  • The contextual-cueing effect was measured under both attention conditions.

Main Results:

  • Focused attention abolished the contextual-cueing effect when target locations changed.
  • Distributed attention allowed rapid recovery of the cueing effect after target location changes.
  • The cueing effect in distributed attention recovered to levels comparable to the initial learning phase.

Conclusions:

  • Distributed attention facilitates more flexible updating of spatial context memories compared to focused attention.
  • Broad attentional sets support the integration of local changes within global context representations.
  • Attentional mode significantly influences the adaptability of contextual cueing in visual search.