Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

8.5K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
8.5K
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

120
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
120

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The efficacy of wrapping with polyglycolic acid mesh and fibrin glue in preventing clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (WRAP Study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Japan.

BMC surgery·2024
Same author

[Effects of Subject Position on Metal Artifact Reduction of a Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis Using Computed Tomography].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi·2024
Same author

[Reduction of Motion Artifacts in Liver MRI Using Deep Learning with High-pass Filtering].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi·2024
Same author

Subcutaneous angiogenesis induced by transdermal delivery of gel-in-oil nanogel dispersion.

Biomaterials advances·2023
Same author

[Participation/Dispatch Reports on the 79th Annual Meeting].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi·2023
Same author

[Subjective Contrast of Pulmonary Tissues in CsI-FPD Chest Radiography Using Model Phantom by Monte Carlo Simulation].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K

[New Method of Paired Comparison for Improved Observer Shortage Using Deep Learning Models].

Nariaki Tabata1,2, Tetsuya Ijichi2, Hirotaka Itai1,3

  • 1Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi
|May 19, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study explored using artificial intelligence (AI) in computed tomography (CT) image analysis. Deep learning models showed potential to substitute human observers in paired comparisons for image quality assessment.

Keywords:
computed tomographydeep learningobserver studypaired comparison

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.9K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering Electrical Networks Behind Complex Brain Activities and Disorders
05:49

Author Spotlight: Deciphering Electrical Networks Behind Complex Brain Activities and Disorders

Published on: November 1, 2024

772

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.9K
Author Spotlight: Deciphering Electrical Networks Behind Complex Brain Activities and Disorders
05:49

Author Spotlight: Deciphering Electrical Networks Behind Complex Brain Activities and Disorders

Published on: November 1, 2024

772

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Assessing medical image quality is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
  • Human observers perform paired comparisons to evaluate image quality, which can be time-consuming.
  • Deep learning (DL) offers a potential automated solution for image quality assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the use of a deep learning observer as a substitute for human observers in paired comparisons of computed tomography (CT) images.
  • To assess the performance of DL models in evaluating image quality under varying imaging conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Computed tomography phantom images were acquired under six different imaging conditions with varying tube currents (20-200 mA).
  • Fourteen experienced radiologic technologists performed pairwise comparisons using Ura's method.
  • Deep learning models (VGG16 and VGG19) were trained and evaluated for accuracy, recall, precision, specificity, and F1-score.

Main Results:

  • The deep learning model achieved an average accuracy of 82%.
  • The DL model's average degree of preference showed a small average difference of 0.05 compared to the human observer standard.
  • Significant differences were detected by the DL model for image pairs with tube currents of 160 mA vs. 120 mA and 200 mA vs. 160 mA.

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning models show potential as observers in paired comparisons for evaluating CT image quality, particularly with limited phantoms and noise evaluations.
  • AI can assist in image quality assessment, potentially improving efficiency in radiology workflows.