Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Subliminal Perception

Subliminal Perception

Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...

Auditory Pathway

Auditory Pathway

Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Hearing

Hearing

When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...

Doppler Effect - II

Doppler Effect - II

The Doppler effect has several practical, real-world applications. For instance, meteorologists use Doppler radars to interpret weather events based on the Doppler effect. Typically, a transmitter emits radio waves at a specific frequency toward the sky from a weather station. The radio waves bounce off the clouds and precipitation and travel back to the weather station. The radio frequency of the waves reflected back to the station appears to decrease if the clouds or precipitation are moving...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Corrigendum to "Eye movements of younger and older adults decrease during story listening in background noise" [Hearing Research 468 (2025) 109447].

Hearing research·2026

Same author

Not All Rules Are Equal: Rare Conditional Rules Shape Behaviour but Yield to Global Probability in Passive Listening.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Same author

Voluntary Attention Selectively Modulates Omission Responses.

Human brain mapping·2026

Same author

The Impact of Action Intention Versus Action-Effect Intention on Auditory Prediction Error Signals.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Same author

Neural Correlates of Dynamic Predictions and Prediction Errors in Response to Unexpected Silence and Sound.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Same author

Measuring the Genuine Mismatch Negativity in the Auditory Multi-Feature Paradigm.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Suppression and omission effects in auditory predictive processing-Two of the same?

Valentina Tast¹, Erich Schröger¹, Andreas Widmann¹

¹Wilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

The European Journal of Neuroscience

|May 19, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Auditory predictive processing involves internal models adjusted by prediction errors. This study found that while omission N1 (a brain response) reflects prediction error, N1 suppression (reduced response to self-generated sounds) does not, suggesting different underlying mechanisms.

Keywords:

EEG N1 auditory omission predictive coding

More Related Videos

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

Habituation and Prepulse Inhibition of Acoustic Startle in Rodents

Habituation and Prepulse Inhibition of Acoustic Startle in Rodents

Published on: September 1, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

Habituation and Prepulse Inhibition of Acoustic Startle in Rodents

Habituation and Prepulse Inhibition of Acoustic Startle in Rodents

Published on: September 1, 2011

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Science
Auditory Perception

Background:

Perception is theorized as an inferential process utilizing internal predictive models.
Auditory predictive processing is often studied through modulations of the N1 event-related potential component.
N1 suppression (attenuated response to self-generated sounds) and omission N1 (response to omitted self-generated sounds) are key phenomena.

Purpose of the Study:

To directly test the common theoretical account of action-related forward modeling for both N1 suppression and omission N1.
To investigate the role of sound predictability in auditory predictive processing.
To determine if N1 suppression and omission N1 rely on the same or different predictive mechanisms.

Main Methods:

A self-generation sound paradigm was used to manipulate sound predictability.
Two conditions were employed: 80% predictability (strong expectation) and 50% predictability (weak expectation).
The auditory N1 event-related brain potential component was measured.

Main Results:

An omission N1 was observed in the 80% predictability condition but not in the 50% condition.
N1 suppression showed no significant difference between the 80% and 50% predictability conditions.
Predictability significantly affected the omission N1, but not N1 suppression.

Conclusions:

The results demonstrate a clear effect of predictability on the omission N1, supporting forward modeling accounts.
N1 suppression appears to be independent of the manipulated predictability, challenging unified predictive accounts.
These findings suggest that N1 suppression and omission N1 may involve distinct neural mechanisms.