Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

156
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
156
Neuroplasticity01:01

Neuroplasticity

328
Neuroplasticity reflects the brain's remarkable capacity to adapt and evolve, responding dynamically to learning, experiences, or injury by reorganizing its neural circuitry. This reorganization involves creating new neural connections and refining old ones through a series of biological processes that contribute to the brain's lifelong development and adaptability.
328
Long-term Potentiation01:35

Long-term Potentiation

55.1K
Long-term potentiation, or LTP, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTP is the process of synaptic strengthening that occurs over time between pre- and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic strengthening of LTP works in opposition to the synaptic weakening of long-term depression (LTD) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
55.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comprehensive 3D mapping reveals distinct spatial gradients of SST, PV, and TH interneurons across the mouse caudoputamen.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A transposase-derived gene required for human brain development.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Convergent Control of NREM Sleep and Anesthesia by Prefrontal Layer 5 Extratelencephalic Neurons.

Research square·2025
Same author

Changes in brain connectivity and neurovascular dynamics during dexmedetomidine-induced loss of consciousness.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

The Administration of Ketamine Is Associated with Dose-Dependent Stabilization of Cortical Dynamics in Humans.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Hormonal basis of sex differences in anesthetic sensitivity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K

Attractor dynamics with activity-dependent plasticity capture human working memory across time scales.

Connor Brennan1, Alex Proekt1

  • 1University of Pennsylvania, 3160 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Communications Psychology
|May 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Working memory relies on brain activity, but simple attractor models fail across different timescales. Combining attractor dynamics with plasticity better explains durable information storage in working memory.

More Related Videos

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
08:36

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms

Published on: March 21, 2019

7.3K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K
Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
08:36

Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms

Published on: March 21, 2019

7.3K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Working memory is crucial for cognitive functions, involving the brain's ability to retain recent stimuli.
  • Neuronal activity configurations, known as attractors, are hypothesized to store working memories.
  • Existing models often simplify the temporal dynamics of memory storage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test if discrete attractor dynamics accurately model working memory across multiple timescales.
  • To investigate the limitations of current attractor models in capturing the complexity of memory storage.
  • To develop an improved model that accounts for longer delay intervals and intertrial interactions.

Main Methods:

  • A human working memory task with varied delay periods was employed.
  • Discrete attractor dynamics were initially used to model neuronal activity.
  • A novel model combining attractor dynamics with activity-dependent plasticity was developed and tested.

Main Results:

  • Discrete attractor dynamics approximated working memory at short timescales but failed to generalize across multiple delays.
  • Longer delay intervals revealed more stimulus information than discrete attractors could store.
  • The combined model successfully generalized across all timescales and predicted intertrial interactions.

Conclusions:

  • Discrete attractor dynamics alone are insufficient for comprehensive working memory modeling.
  • Activity-dependent plasticity enhances the durability of information storage within attractor systems.
  • The findings suggest a more complex mechanism involving plasticity for robust working memory.