Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
Published on: November 15, 2013
Shrinkage with shrunken shoulders: Gibbs sampling shrinkage model posteriors with guaranteed convergence rates
Akihiko Nishimura1, Marc A Suchard2
1Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Abstract:
Use of continuous shrinkage priors - with a "spike" near zero and heavy-tails towards infinity - is an increasingly popular approach to induce sparsity in parameter estimates. When the parameters are only weakly identified by the likelihood, however, the posterior may end up with tails as heavy as the prior, jeopardizing robustness of inference. A natural solution is to "shrink the shoulders" of a shrinkage prior by lightening up its tails beyond a reasonable parameter range, yielding a regularized version of the prior. We develop a regularization approach which, unlike previous proposals, preserves computationally attractive structures of original shrinkage priors. We study theoretical properties of the Gibbs sampler on resulting posterior distributions, with emphasis on convergence rates of the Pólya-Gamma Gibbs sampler for sparse logistic regression. Our analysis shows that the proposed regularization leads to geometric ergodicity under a broad range of global-local shrinkage priors. Essentially, the only requirement is for the prior on the local scale to satisfy . If further satisfies for , as in the case of Bayesian bridge priors, we show the sampler to be uniformly ergodic.
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Distribution
Central Limit Theorem
The sample size, n, that...
Sampling Theorem
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

