Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

1.7K
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
1.7K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion01:20

Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion

378
Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer proposed the two-factor theory of emotion, which emphasizes the interplay between physiological arousal and cognitive labeling in forming emotional experiences. This theory suggests that emotions are not simply a result of physiological responses but rather a combination of these responses and the individual's cognitive interpretation of them.
Physiological Arousal and Cognitive Labeling
According to this theory, when an individual experiences...
378
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

106
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
106
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

1.6K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
1.6K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Computational Modelling Reveals Slower Safety Learning and Threat Extinction are Associated With Higher Anxiety Severity in Remote Fear Conditioning.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Test-Retest Reliability of Two Computationally-Characterised Affective Bias Tasks.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)·2024
Same author

Independent replications reveal anterior and posterior cingulate cortex activation underlying state anxiety-attenuated face encoding.

Communications psychology·2024
Same author

Antisocial Learning: Using Learning Window Width to Model Callous-Unemotional Traits?

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)·2024
Same author

Catastrophizing and Risk-Taking.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)·2024
Same author

Thinking computationally in translational psychiatry. A commentary on Neville et al. (2024).

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.6K

Reward Sensitivity and Noise Contribute to Negative Affective Bias: A Learning Signal Detection Theory Approach in

Isabel K Lütkenherm1, Shannon M Locke2, Oliver J Robinson1,3

  • 1Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK.

Computational Psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)
|May 22, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Negative affective bias in mood disorders may stem from reduced reward sensitivity and more variable responses. This study investigated the mechanisms behind prioritizing negative information in decision-making tasks.

Keywords:
Mood DisordersNegative Affective BiasProspect TheoryReinforcement LearningReward SensitivitySignal Detection Theory

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.0K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.6K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.0K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry
  • Computational Psychiatry

Background:

  • Negative affective biases are common in mood disorders, leading to biased information processing.
  • Depression is associated with a reduced preference for high rewards in ambiguous decision-making.
  • The underlying mechanisms of this negative affective bias remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanisms driving negative affective bias in mood disorders.
  • To examine the relationship between affective bias and reward sensitivity, value sensitivity, and reward learning rate.
  • To understand how reduced reward sensitivity and increased response variability contribute to negative affective bias.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized three online behavioral tasks: a decision-making task for affective bias, a probabilistic reward learning task, and a gambling task.
  • Employed computational modeling, including dynamic signal detection theory and expectation-maximization prospect theory.
  • Recruited 148 participants to complete the study.

Main Results:

  • Reward sensitivity and setting noise from the probabilistic reward task significantly predicted the affective bias score.
  • A logistic regression model indicated that both factors were significant predictors (p < 0.05).
  • Findings suggest a link between reward processing and negative information prioritization.

Conclusions:

  • Negative affective bias, in this context, appears partly driven by diminished sensitivity to rewards.
  • Increased response variability may also contribute to the observed affective bias.
  • These findings offer insights into the computational mechanisms underlying mood disorders.