Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

550
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
550
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

680
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
680
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

516
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
516
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.6K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

5.7K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A PbS quantum dot film as a hole transport layer for self-powered AgBiS<sub>2</sub> nanocrystal photodetectors.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence for detecting fetal orofacial clefts and advancing medical education.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

HER2∆16 directs luminal cell identity and estrogen receptor signaling in HER2+ breast cancer.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Tirofiban for Reduction of TEAR: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded End Point, Controlled Trial.

Stroke·2026
Same author

Epigenetic reprogramming of tissue-resident memory T cells in chronic inflammatory disorders and implications for targeted therapies.

Epigenomics·2026
Same author

Photoinduced Cyclization of 2-Alkynylanilines to Access 3-Bromoindole Scaffolds.

The Journal of organic chemistry·2026
Same journal

Measuring the impact of virtualization and containerization on the environment when using GPUs for processing the AI models.

Frontiers in big data·2026
Same journal

Using artificial intelligence to improve governance and public services in Africa.

Frontiers in big data·2026
Same journal

Case count metric for comparative analysis of entity resolution results.

Frontiers in big data·2026
Same journal

Data field theory: a geometric framework for learning on Riemannian manifolds with synthetic validation and limitation analysis.

Frontiers in big data·2026
Same journal

Correction: Explainable gradient convolutional vector fuzzy pattern analysis based on ensemble model for facial expression recognition.

Frontiers in big data·2026
Same journal

When uncertainty guides learning: a highly effective approach to kidney disease classification in CT imaging.

Frontiers in big data·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.3K

Quantifying uncertainty in graph neural network explanations.

Junji Jiang1, Chen Ling2, Hongyi Li3

  • 1School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Frontiers in Big Data
|May 24, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new framework to quantify uncertainty in Graph Neural Network (GNN) explanations. It addresses randomness in graph data and model parameters for more reliable GNN predictions.

Keywords:
deep learningexplanation uncertaintygraph neural networkuncertainty quantificationvariational mechanism

More Related Videos

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.1K
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.3K
Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.1K
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Graph Neural Networks

Background:

  • Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are increasingly used for complex data analysis.
  • Existing GNN explanation methods often overlook uncertainties from data and model parameters, leading to unreliable explanations.
  • Quantifying uncertainty in post-hoc, model-agnostic GNN explanations is challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel framework for uncertainty quantification in GNN explanations.
  • To address the limitations of existing methods by considering data and parameter uncertainties.
  • To improve the reliability and trustworthiness of GNN predictions.

Main Methods:

  • A new uncertainty quantification framework for GNN explanations is proposed.
  • The framework accounts for two distinct data uncertainties to assess explanation uncertainty.
  • It learns parameter distributions directly from data, quantifying explanation uncertainty without distribution assumptions.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework successfully quantifies uncertainties stemming from graph data and model parameters.
  • It integrates seamlessly with existing post-hoc GNN explanation methods.
  • Empirical results demonstrate superior GNN explanation performance on real-world benchmarks.

Conclusions:

  • The novel framework provides a robust solution for uncertainty quantification in GNN explanations.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of GNN predictions by accounting for inherent uncertainties.
  • The method sets a new standard for GNN explanation performance and trustworthiness.