Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents01:24

Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents

446
In the intricate landscape of the gastric lumen, excessive acid secretion disrupts the natural defense mechanisms, weakening the mucus-bicarbonate barrier. This vulnerability allows pepsin to infiltrate epithelial cells, digesting mucosal proteins and triggering erosion, leading to ulcer formation.
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...
446
Mucosal Barrier of the Stomach01:25

Mucosal Barrier of the Stomach

625
The gastric glands contain parietal cells that secrete hydrochloric acid (HCl) for digestion. The cells secrete HCl because it is highly corrosive and essential for breaking down food. To achieve this, they secrete hydrogen and chloride ions into the lumen of the gastric glands, which combine to form HCl.
Within parietal cells, carbonic acid is first formed through the reaction of water and carbon dioxide. The dissociation of carbonic acid releases bicarbonate and hydrogen ions. The bicarbonate...
625
Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mucosal Defense Factors01:24

Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mucosal Defense Factors

380
Peptic ulcer disease, commonly called PUD, represents a multifaceted condition characterized by disruptions in the lining of the gastrointestinal (GI)  tract. Central to the protection of the gastrointestinal lining is the mucosal-bicarbonate barrier. This physiological defense mechanism is a formidable shield against the corrosive effects of gastric acid and pepsin secretion in the stomach. Its role is pivotal in maintaining the structural integrity of the stomach's inner lining.
380
Surface Membrane Barriers01:18

Surface Membrane Barriers

1.1K
The skin and mucous membranes serve as the primary line of defense against pathogens by providing both physical and chemical protection. These barriers are essential in preventing the entry and establishment of microbes, thereby maintaining the integrity of the host.
The outer layer of the skin, the epidermis, is a robust barrier comprising layers of closely packed keratinized cells. This dense arrangement prevents microbes from penetrating the body. The periodic shedding of epidermal cells...
1.1K
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents01:20

Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents

408
The gastric mucosa produces prostaglandins E2 (PGE2) and prostacyclin (PGI2), crucial in maintaining gastric health. They exert cytoprotective effects, including increasing bicarbonate secretion, releasing protective mucin, reducing gastric acid output, and preventing harmful vasoconstriction. These effects are mediated through various receptors, such as EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...
408
Peptic Ulcer Disease II: Pathophysiology01:28

Peptic Ulcer Disease II: Pathophysiology

390
Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD) is characterized by the development of ulcers in the stomach or duodenal mucosa. Its pathophysiology is complex, involving a balance between damaging and protective elements.
Damaging agents such as Helicobacter pylori, gastric acid, pepsin, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can weaken the mucosal defense, allowing hydrogen ions to infiltrate back and harm epithelial cells.
390

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Kidney Selective Bcl2 Inhibitor Delivery Improves Fibrosis Treatment.

ACS applied bio materials·2026
Same author

Electrochemical Nanosensor-Based Emerging Point-Of-Care Tools: Progress and Prospects.

Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology·2024
Same author

Lipid nanoparticles for enhancing oral bioavailability.

Nanoscale·2024
Same author

Forum on Biomaterials for Immune and Gene Delivery.

ACS applied bio materials·2024
Same author

Targeted Biodegradable Near-Infrared Fluorescent Nanoparticles for Colorectal Cancer Imaging.

ACS applied bio materials·2024
Same author

Liver fibrosis pathologies and potentials of RNA based therapeutics modalities.

Drug delivery and translational research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Preparation, Characteristics, Toxicity, and Efficacy Evaluation of the Nasal Self-Assembled Nanoemulsion Tumor Vaccine In Vitro and In Vivo
07:33

Preparation, Characteristics, Toxicity, and Efficacy Evaluation of the Nasal Self-Assembled Nanoemulsion Tumor Vaccine In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: September 28, 2022

1.8K

Understanding Mucosal Physiology and Rationale of Formulation Design for Improved Mucosal Immunity.

Mila Biswas1, Md Nurunnabi2,3, Zehedina Khatun2

  • 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79902, United States.

ACS Applied Bio Materials
|May 24, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Mucosal membranes protect against pathogens. Advanced formulations like liposomes and mucoadhesive particles enhance mucosal immunity for better vaccine development.

Keywords:
infectious agentsmucoadhesive polymermucosal adjuvantmucosal drug delivery systemmucosal immunitymucosal vaccinemucus layer

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Development and Evaluation of a Cationic Nanoemulsion-Encapsulated Retinoic Acid System for Mucosal Vaccination
06:02

Author Spotlight: Development and Evaluation of a Cationic Nanoemulsion-Encapsulated Retinoic Acid System for Mucosal Vaccination

Published on: February 23, 2024

643
Cellular Affinity of Particle-Stabilized Emulsion to Boost Antigen Internalization
10:06

Cellular Affinity of Particle-Stabilized Emulsion to Boost Antigen Internalization

Published on: September 2, 2022

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Preparation, Characteristics, Toxicity, and Efficacy Evaluation of the Nasal Self-Assembled Nanoemulsion Tumor Vaccine In Vitro and In Vivo
07:33

Preparation, Characteristics, Toxicity, and Efficacy Evaluation of the Nasal Self-Assembled Nanoemulsion Tumor Vaccine In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: September 28, 2022

1.8K
Author Spotlight: Development and Evaluation of a Cationic Nanoemulsion-Encapsulated Retinoic Acid System for Mucosal Vaccination
06:02

Author Spotlight: Development and Evaluation of a Cationic Nanoemulsion-Encapsulated Retinoic Acid System for Mucosal Vaccination

Published on: February 23, 2024

643
Cellular Affinity of Particle-Stabilized Emulsion to Boost Antigen Internalization
10:06

Cellular Affinity of Particle-Stabilized Emulsion to Boost Antigen Internalization

Published on: September 2, 2022

1.8K

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Vaccinology

Background:

  • Mucosal membranes in the oral and nasal cavities are primary entry points for pathogens.
  • The mucosal barrier is essential for defense against infection and maintaining homeostasis.
  • Mucosal tolerance is vital for regulating physiological balance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the role of material selection and delivery systems in optimizing mucosal immunity.
  • To highlight the potential of mucosal formulations in enhancing immune responses.

Main Methods:

  • Review of scientific literature on mucosal immunity and formulations.
  • Analysis of lipid-based (liposomes, virosomes) and polymeric delivery systems.
  • Evaluation of studies demonstrating immune response enhancement.

Main Results:

  • Lipid-based formulations (liposomes, virosomes) effectively induce local and systemic immunity.
  • Mucoadhesive polymeric particles provide prolonged delivery and enhanced immune responses.
  • Material choice and delivery strategy significantly impact mucosal immunity.

Conclusions:

  • Optimizing material selection and delivery approaches is key to enhancing mucosal immunity.
  • Mucosal vaccines utilizing advanced formulations show promise for improved immune stimulation.
  • Further research into mucosal delivery systems can lead to more effective vaccines.