Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Personalizing cardiovascular risk prediction for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
May Y Choi1, Hongshu Guan2, Kazuki Yoshida2
1Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Rheumatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Insights
A new tool, SLECRISK, improves cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients. SLECRISK is more sensitive than current methods, especially for young women with severe SLE.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Cardiology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) significantly increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
- General population CVD prediction algorithms underestimate risk in SLE patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate SLECRISK, a novel prediction tool for CVD risk specifically in SLE patients.
- To improve the accuracy of CVD risk assessment in SLE compared to existing models.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Brigham and Women's Hospital SLE cohort with 10-year follow-up for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
- Employed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression to identify SLE-specific predictors for a Cox regression model.
- Compared SLECRISK performance against ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Risk Equations, Framingham Risk Score (FRS), and modified FRS (mFRS).
Main Results:
- SLECRISK identified key SLE-related predictors: SLE activity, disease duration, creatinine, anti-dsDNA, anti-RNP, lupus anticoagulant, anti-Ro positivity, and low C4.
- SLECRISK demonstrated higher sensitivity (0.74) in detecting moderate/high 10-year MACE risk compared to the ACC/AHA model (0.38).
- The tool identified 3.4-fold more high-risk patients and showed similar performance to FRS and mFRS.
Conclusions:
- SLECRISK offers enhanced sensitivity for predicting 10-year MACE risk in SLE patients.
- The tool is particularly valuable for identifying high-risk young women with severe SLE and fewer traditional CVD risk factors.
- External validation in cohorts with more severe SLE is recommended for future studies.
Objective:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is increased in SLE and underestimated by general population prediction algorithms. We aimed to develop a novel SLE-specific prediction tool, SLECRISK, to provide a more accurate estimate of CVD risk in SLE.
Methods:
We studied patients in the Brigham and Women's Hospital SLE cohort. We collected one-year baseline data including the presence of traditional CVD factors and SLE-related features at cohort enrollment. Ten-year follow-up for the first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or cardiac death) began at day +1 following the baseline period (index date). ICD-9/10 codes identified MACE were adjudicated by board-certified cardiologists. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression selected SLE-related variables to add to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Pooled Cohort Risk Equations 10-year risk Cox regression model. Model fit statistics and performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value, c-statistic) for predicting moderate/high 10-year risk (≥7.5 %) of MACE were assessed and compared to ACC/AHA, Framingham risk score (FRS), and modified FRS (mFRS). Optimism adjustment internal validation was performed using bootstrapping.
Results:
We included 1,243 patients with 90 MACEs (46 MIs, 36 strokes, 19 cardiac deaths) over 8946.5 person-years of follow-up. SLE variables selected for the new prediction algorithm (SLECRISK) were SLE activity (remission/mild vs. moderate/severe), disease duration (years), creatinine (mg/dL), anti-dsDNA, anti-RNP, lupus anticoagulant, anti-Ro positivity, and low C4. The sensitivity for detecting moderate/high-risk (≥7.5 %) of MACE using SLECRISK was 0.74 (95 %CI: 0.65, 0.83), which was better than the sensitivity of the ACC/AHA model (0.38 (95 %CI: 0.28, 0.48)). It also identified 3.4-fold more moderate/high-risk patients than the ACC/AHA. Patients who were moderate/high-risk according to SLECRISK but not ACC/AHA, were more likely to be young women with severe SLE and few other traditional CVD risk factors. Model performance between SLECRISK, FRS, and mFRS were similar.
Conclusion:
The novel SLECRISK tool is more sensitive than the ACC/AHA for predicting moderate/high 10-year risk for MACE and may be particularly useful in predicting risk for young females with severe SLE. Future external validation studies utilizing cohorts with more severe SLE are needed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:

