Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

178
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
178
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

1.3K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proposed New AV-Type Test-Bed for Accurate and Reliable Fish-Eye Lens Camera Self-Calibration.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Analysis of Fish-Eye Lens Camera Self-Calibration.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2019
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

1.2K

Calibration Methods for Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors Considering Seasonal Variability.

Jiwoo Kang1, Kanghyeok Choi1

  • 1Department of Geoinformatic Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|May 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study improved particulate matter (PM) sensor accuracy by incorporating meridian altitude into calibration models. This method enhances seasonal variability accounting, leading to more reliable air quality monitoring for public health.

Keywords:
calibrationenvironment factorslow-cost sensorparticulate matterseasonal variability

More Related Videos

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
10:29

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers

Published on: March 21, 2016

12.3K
Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System
08:59

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System

Published on: May 22, 2020

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

1.2K
Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
10:29

Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers

Published on: March 21, 2016

12.3K
Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System
08:59

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System

Published on: May 22, 2020

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Atmospheric Chemistry
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Low-cost sensors are crucial for high-resolution monitoring of particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) for public health management.
  • Existing calibration methods for these sensors struggle to accurately account for seasonal variations in PM concentration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an improved calibration methodology for low-cost particulate matter sensors.
  • To enhance the accuracy of PM sensor readings by incorporating meridian altitude to better represent seasonal variability.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized meridian altitude as a novel variable for calibrating seasonal variations in PM concentration.
  • Applied feedforward neural networks, support vector machines, generalized additive models, and stepwise linear regression for model validation.
  • Treated calibrated PM2.5 as a subset of PM10 for PM10 calibration.

Main Results:

  • Inclusion of meridian altitude significantly improved the accuracy and explanatory power of PM calibration models.
  • For PM2.5, a combination of relative humidity, temperature, and meridian altitude achieved an R² of 0.93 and RMSE of 5.6 µg/m³.
  • For PM10, calibration with meridian altitude reduced mean absolute percentage error from 27.41% to 18.55%, further dropping to 15.35% with calibrated PM2.5 inclusion.

Conclusions:

  • Meridian altitude is an effective variable for improving seasonal calibration of low-cost PM sensors.
  • The proposed methodology enhances the reliability of air quality data derived from low-cost sensor networks.
  • Accurate PM monitoring through improved sensor calibration supports better public health strategies.