Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Integrating Ultrasound Imaging with Biochemical Markers for Thyroid Disease Diagnosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
Sonographic risk stratification of FDG-avid thyroid nodules using the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System
Tianchi Ren1, Ilona Lavender1, Peter Coombs1
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TIRADS) classification can help risk-stratify incidental thyroid nodules detected on PET/CT scans. Nodules with low TIRADS scores (1 or 2) or no suspicious features have a 0% malignancy risk and may not need fine-needle aspiration (FNA).
Area of Science:
- Nuclear medicine
- Radiology
- Endocrinology
Background:
- Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans increasingly detect incidental thyroid nodules.
- 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG)-avid nodules carry a high risk of malignancy and require further investigation.
- Limited research exists on risk stratification for FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) classification in risk stratification.
- To assess the need for fine-needle aspirate cytology (FNA) in incidentally detected FDG-avid thyroid nodules.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective data collection of FDG-avid thyroid incidentalomas over 10 years.
- Nodules characterized using ACR TIRADS classification.
- Fine-needle aspirate cytology (FNAC) performed, with results classified using the Bethesda system (excluding non-diagnostic samples).
Main Results:
- Malignancy rates were 36% for low-risk and 45% for high-risk nodules (P=0.516).
- ACR TIRADS sensitivity and specificity for malignancy detection were 56% and 54%, respectively.
- No malignant nodules were found in TIRADS 1 or 2 categories; absence of suspicious sonographic features had a 1.0 negative predictive value.
Conclusions:
- FDG-avid nodules classified as TIRADS 1 or 2, or those lacking suspicious ultrasound features, have a 0% incidence of malignancy and may not require FNA.
- FDG-avid nodules classified as TIRADS 3 or higher warrant FNA due to high malignancy risk and the TIRADS system's limited sensitivity.
More Related Videos
04:23A Swin Transformer-Based Model for Thyroid Nodule Detection in Ultrasound Images
Published on: April 21, 2023
10:02Quantification of Atherosclerotic Plaque Activity and Vascular Inflammation using [18-F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography FDG-PET/CT
Published on: May 2, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET