How the French national authority for health assesses medicines for use in pediatrics
Chloé Rebstock1, Bertrand Mussetta1, Sandrine Martinez1
1Service d'évaluation des médicaments, Haute Autorité de santé, 5 Avenue du Stade de France, 93210 Saint-Denis, France.
Insights
Ensuring children receive appropriate medicines requires robust clinical trials. The French Transparency Committee (TC) reviewed pediatric medicine evaluations, finding that quality evidence significantly impacts clinical benefit and added value, aiming to reduce off-label drug use.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric pharmacology
- Drug evaluation
- Health policy
Background:
- Availability of pediatric medicines remains suboptimal due to challenges in conducting clinical trials.
- New regulations aim to improve pediatric drug assessment, but practical implementation faces hurdles.
- The French Transparency Committee (TC) initiated a working group to address these issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review all TC opinions on medicines for pediatric use between 2020 and 2022.
- To clarify the evaluation criteria: clinical benefit (CB), clinical added value (CAV), and public health impact (PHI) for pediatric drugs.
- To identify factors influencing these criteria and propose measures to reduce off-label drug use.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 536 TC opinions (2020-2022), identifying 181 concerning pediatric use.
- Evaluation of CB, CAV, and PHI based on submitted dossiers, distinguishing between clinical studies and literature reviews.
- Comparison of assessment criteria for pediatric versus adult indications.
Main Results:
- Medicines for infectious diseases, endocrinology/metabolism, neurology, and hematology were prevalent for children, unlike adult-focused oncology.
- High CB was granted to 71% of pediatric drug opinions for severe prognoses; quality of evidence (e.g., RCTs) was crucial.
- Clinical pediatric studies correlated with higher CAV; dossiers relying solely on literature reviews often received the lowest CAV rating (Level V).
Conclusions:
- Robust clinical trial data is essential for demonstrating significant clinical benefit and added value of pediatric medicines.
- Assessment criteria for pediatric drugs are largely aligned with adult indications, with PHI focusing on morbidity/mortality reduction and care pathway improvement.
- Measures to expedite assessment processes are being implemented to minimize off-label medication use in children.
Abstract:
Children deserve to be treated with appropriate medicines based on robust assessments. Despite the introduction of new regulations, the availability of medicines for children is suboptimal because of the frequent lack of relevant clinical trials due to the difficulty of conducting such trials. Thus, the Transparency Committee (TC) of the French National Authority for Health, who oversees the assessment of medicinal products in France, set up a pediatric working group with two aims: (1) The first aim was to review all opinions on medicines for pediatric use. Out of 536 opinions delivered between 2020 and 2022, 181 (34 %) concerned medicines for pediatric use. Whereas oncology largely dominated the medicines for adults, medicines for infectious diseases, endocrinology/metabolism, neurology, and hematology mostly prevailed for children. (2) The second aim was to clarify the evaluation criteria assessed by the TC, namely, the clinical benefit (CB), the clinical added value (CAV), and the public health impact (PHI) for pediatric medicinal products. An important CB was given to 113 out of 161 (71 %) opinions on medicines for pediatric use when it concerned pathologies with a severe prognosis. The quality of the demonstration (e.g., double-blind randomized trial vs. placebo or another active medicine) played a major role in the CB level. Clinical pediatric studies were also consistently associated with higher CAV levels: levels I (major) to III (moderate) in 26 out of 42 (62 %) opinions, level IV (minor) and level V (no therapeutic progress) in 43 out of 84 (51 %) and 30 out of 43 (70 %) opinions granting a sufficient CB, respectively. Conversely, 22 out of 30 (73 %) dossiers based only on literature reviews were given a level V. The main criteria leading to the qualification of a medicine for pediatric use as providing a PHI included a significant change in the morbidity and mortality of the disease and an improvement in the care pathway. Assessments were mostly aligned on the adults in the case of subsequent extensions of indications to children. Lastly, new measures were taken aimed at shortening median delays in the assessment process in order to reduce off-label use of medicines in France.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Prescription, Nonprescription and Orphan Drugs
The misuse and addiction to prescription drugs is a growing problem that can affect people of all age groups, specifically teenagers. This can happen when prescription medications are used in ways not intended by the prescriber, such as taking someone else's prescription or using medication for...
Drug Classes and Categories
Preclinical Development: Overview


