Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities
Published on: February 20, 2021
Determination of kilovoltage x-ray therapy depth doses with open-ended applicators
Anne Perkins1, Brendan Healy2, Ben Coldrey3
1Icon Cancer Centre Freemasons, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia. anne.perkins@icon.team.
Abstract:
The purpose of this work was to determine percentage depth dose (PDD) curves for kilovoltage x-rays from the WOmed-T105 unit, with open-ended steel applicators and beam qualities ranging from 0.5 to 4.2 mm Al. Measurements were made with parallel plate chambers in a water phantom, with extrapolation based on a fifth order polynomial used to estimate the surface dose. Measurements were also made with parallel plate chambers in a plastic water phantom, with thin plastic sheets used to obtain detailed measurements at shallow depths (less than 1 mm). Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the EGSnrc package, with two different sources as input: a SpekPy simulation of the x-ray beam and a full simulation of the x-ray tube, treatment head and applicators. Results showed that all four methods (two measurements and two simulations) agreed within the measurement uncertainty at depths greater than 2 mm. At shallow depths, significant differences were noted. At depths less than 0.1 mm, the full Monte Carlo simulation and the solid water measurements showed a sharp spike in surface dose which is attributed to electron contamination, which was not seen in the SpekPy Monte Carlo simulation or the extrapolated water measurements. At depths between 0.1 mm and 2 mm, beyond the range of contaminant electrons, the extrapolated water measurements underestimate the dose by up to 13% compared to the full Monte Carlo simulation and the solid water measurements, attributed to fluorescent photons generated in the applicators. This work demonstrates that for open-ended applicators, measurement of depth doses in water with extrapolation of surface dose has the potential to significantly underestimate the dose at shallow depths between the surface and 2 mm, even after eliminating electron contamination from the beam.
More Related Videos
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
07:31Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014