Cerebral blood flow and structural connectivity after working memory or physical training in paediatric cancer

Schuerch Kirstin1,2,3,4, Grieder Matthias4, Benzing Valetin1,2,5

  • 1Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Insights

Working memory training may improve cognitive function in paediatric cancer survivors by altering brain activity and connectivity. Physical training did not show similar neurophysiological effects.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Paediatric Oncology
  • Cognitive Rehabilitation

Background:

  • Paediatric cancer survivors frequently experience long-term cognitive deficits, necessitating interventions to enhance cognitive function.
  • Cognitive impairments significantly impact survivors' quality of life and daily functioning.
  • Targeting cognitive rehabilitation is crucial for improving outcomes in this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neurophysiological effects of working memory training and physical training on cognitive function in paediatric cancer survivors.
  • To compare cerebral changes associated with working memory training versus physical training.
  • To explore the relationship between cognitive changes and neuroimaging findings.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 34 paediatric cancer survivors (non-brain tumour) one year post-treatment.
  • Participants were randomized into working memory training (n=10), physical training (n=11), or a control group (n=13).
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including arterial spin labelling and diffusion tensor imaging, alongside cognitive assessments, were conducted at baseline, post-training, and at a three-month follow-up.

Main Results:

  • Working memory training led to decreased cerebral blood flow immediately post-intervention (p=.038) and increased structural connectivity at follow-up (p=.025).
  • Physical training did not yield significant cerebral changes.
  • Short-term cerebral blood flow changes correlated with cognitive flexibility (r=-.667, p=.049), and long-term structural connectivity changes correlated with working memory improvements (r=.786, p=.021).

Conclusions:

  • Working memory training shows potential for inducing neurophysiological changes in paediatric cancer survivors.
  • The findings suggest a link between working memory training and improvements in brain structure and function.
  • Further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to confirm these neurocognitive rehabilitation effects.

Related Concept Videos