Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

12:49
Porcine Liver Transplantation Without Veno-Venous Bypass As an Extended Criteria Donor Model
Published on: August 17, 2022
2.4K
Liver Transplant Costs and Activity After United Network for Organ Sharing Allocation Policy Changes
Ola Ahmed1, Maria Bernadette Majella Doyle1, Marwan S Abouljoud2
1Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
JAMA Surgery
|May 29, 2024
Summary
The new liver allocation policy (UNOS) decreased transplant volume by 6% and increased overall hospital costs by 10.9%. This policy disproportionately burdens vulnerable populations, exacerbating existing healthcare disparities.
Area of Science:
- Transplantation research
- Health policy analysis
- Organ allocation systems
Background:
- A new liver allocation policy was implemented by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in February 2020.
- Concerns exist regarding the policy's impact on liver transplant (LT) access and costs.
- Previous analyses have not captured these implications at a multicenter level.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize changes in LT volume and associated costs across US transplant centers.
- To analyze these changes within specific center demographics post-policy implementation.
- To evaluate the financial and logistical impact of the new UNOS policy.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study comparing two 12-month periods before and after the UNOS policy change (March 2019-March 2021).
- Analysis of LT volume and cost data from 22 participating US transplant centers.
- Comparison of outcomes based on center demographics and organ donation sources.
Main Results:
- A 6% decrease in overall LT volume was observed, with a 54% reduction in local donations and a 133% increase in imported donations.
- Overall hospital costs rose by 10.9%, with a 77% increase in fly-out costs.
- Centers serving minority populations and those in low-income states experienced disproportionately higher costs, particularly for imported organs.
Conclusions:
- Contrary to assumptions, the new liver allocation policy appears to increase costs and burden specific patient populations.
- The policy may exacerbate existing healthcare disparities for vulnerable groups awaiting liver transplants.
- Continuous allocation policies could worsen the current situation, necessitating policy review.

