Implementation of a multicomponent medication adherence promotion system is associated with a decrease in late

Julie Bonn1,2, Teresa Ambrosino3, Kristin Rich2,4

  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Insights

Improving medication adherence in pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients using the Medication Adherence Promotion System (MAPS) significantly reduced late T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) by 45%. This quality improvement initiative enhances long-term allograft health and survival.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Transplant Surgery
  • Immunology
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Poor immunosuppression adherence is a primary driver of late T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients, impacting ~90% of cases and increasing mortality risk.
  • The Medication Adherence Promotion System (MAPS) has previously demonstrated efficacy in reducing rejection rates in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To adapt and implement the MAPS within a pediatric LT clinic setting.
  • To evaluate the impact of MAPS on population-level rates of late TCMR in pediatric LT recipients.

Main Methods:

  • Quality improvement methodology was employed to adapt and implement the MAPS.
  • The primary outcome measured was the monthly incident rate of late TCMR.
  • Data were collected from 314 pediatric LT recipients at a single institution over a 2.3-year implementation period.

Main Results:

  • Preimplementation, monthly TCMR rates were 0.84 rejections per 100 patient-months.
  • Following iterative MAPS implementation, monthly TCMR rates decreased to 0.46 rejections per 100 patient-months, representing a 45% reduction.
  • The reduction in late TCMR was sustained throughout the study period.

Conclusions:

  • MAPS implementation was associated with a significant and sustained 45% decrease in TCMR in pediatric LT recipients at a single center.
  • Quality improvement tools like MAPS show promise in improving clinical outcomes and ensuring long-term allograft health in this vulnerable population.
  • Further multicenter studies are warranted to rigorously validate the effectiveness of MAPS across diverse transplant centers.