CDK2 and CDK4: Cell Cycle Functions Evolve Distinct, Catalysis-Competent Conformations, Offering Drug Targets
Wengang Zhang1, Yonglan Liu1, Hyunbum Jang2
1Cancer Innovation Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States.
Abstract:
Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), particularly CDK4 and CDK2, are crucial for cell cycle progression from the Gap 1 (G1) to the Synthesis (S) phase by phosphorylating targets such as the Retinoblastoma Protein (Rb). CDK4, paired with cyclin-D, operates in the long G1 phase, while CDK2 with cyclin-E, manages the brief G1-to-S transition, enabling DNA replication. Aberrant CDK signaling leads to uncontrolled cell proliferation, which is a hallmark of cancer. Exactly how they accomplish their catalytic phosphorylation actions with distinct efficiencies poses the fundamental, albeit overlooked question. Here we combined available experimental data and modeling of the active complexes to establish their conformational functional landscapes to explain how the two cyclin/CDK complexes differentially populate their catalytically competent states for cell cycle progression. Our premise is that CDK catalytic efficiencies could be more important for cell cycle progression than the cyclin-CDK biochemical binding specificity and that efficiency is likely the prime determinant of cell cycle progression. We observe that CDK4 is more dynamic than CDK2 in the ATP binding site, the regulatory spine, and the interaction with its cyclin partner. The N-terminus of cyclin-D acts as an allosteric regulator of the activation loop and the ATP-binding site in CDK4. Integrated with a suite of experimental data, we suggest that the CDK4 complex is less capable of remaining in the active catalytically competent conformation, and may have a lower catalytic efficiency than CDK2, befitting their cell cycle time scales, and point to critical residues and motifs that drive their differences. Our mechanistic landscape may apply broadly to kinases, and we propose two drug design strategies: (i) allosteric Inhibition by conformational stabilization for targeting allosteric CDK4 regulation by cyclin-D, and (ii) dynamic entropy-optimized targeting which leverages the dynamic, entropic aspects of CDK4 to optimize drug binding efficacy.
Insights
Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) control cell cycle progression. This study reveals CDK4/cyclin-D and CDK2/cyclin-E complexes differ in catalytic efficiency, impacting cell cycle timing and offering new drug design strategies.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) regulate cell cycle transitions, notably from G1 to S phase, by phosphorylating targets like the Retinoblastoma Protein (Rb).
- Aberrant CDK signaling is a hallmark of cancer, driving uncontrolled cell proliferation.
- The precise mechanisms underlying the differential catalytic efficiencies of CDK complexes remain largely unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate how CDK4/cyclin-D and CDK2/cyclin-E complexes differentially achieve catalytically competent states for cell cycle progression.
- To investigate the hypothesis that CDK catalytic efficiency, rather than binding specificity, is the primary determinant of cell cycle progression.
- To identify structural and dynamic differences that explain the distinct functional roles of CDK4 and CDK2.
Main Methods:
- Integration of experimental data with computational modeling to establish conformational functional landscapes of active CDK complexes.
- Analysis of dynamic properties within the ATP binding site, regulatory spine, and cyclin interaction interfaces.
- Identification of allosteric regulatory mechanisms, particularly the role of cyclin-D's N-terminus in CDK4 regulation.
Main Results:
- CDK4 exhibits greater dynamics than CDK2 in key functional regions, including the ATP binding site and cyclin interaction interface.
- The N-terminus of cyclin-D allosterically regulates CDK4's activation loop and ATP-binding site.
- CDK4/cyclin-D complexes appear less stable in catalytically competent conformations, suggesting potentially lower catalytic efficiency compared to CDK2/cyclin-E.
Conclusions:
- Differential conformational dynamics and catalytic efficiencies of CDK complexes are critical for precise cell cycle timing.
- The findings suggest catalytic efficiency is a key determinant of cell cycle progression.
- Proposed drug design strategies include allosteric inhibition via conformational stabilization and dynamic entropy-optimized targeting for CDK4.
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Positive Regulator Molecules
S-Cdk Initiates DNA Replication
Two states at the origin of replication
In eukaryotes, the initiation of replication occurs at many sites on the chromosomes, called the origins of...
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
Anaphase Promoting Complex


