Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025
06:18
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.1K
Separating individual and group-level cooperation in the Public Goods Game
Yngwie Asbjørn Nielsen1,2, Stefan Pfattheicher1
1Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
PNAS Nexus
|May 31, 2024
Summary
Group dynamics significantly influence cooperation in public goods games, with group variance increasing over time. Factors like punishment and detailed feedback enhance this group-level cooperation effect.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Social Psychology
- Game Theory
Background:
- Cooperation in public goods games (PGG) arises from individual traits and group dynamics.
- Previous research has not fully separated individual and group contributions to cooperation variance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the variance in cooperation attributable to group-level factors in repeated PGGs.
- To analyze the trajectory of individual versus group variance across PGG rounds.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 10 open datasets (N=4,556, 1,003 groups, 7-50 rounds) from repeated Public Goods Games.
- Tracking the proportion of variance in cooperation at individual and group levels over game rounds.
Main Results:
- Group-level variance in cooperation increases in early rounds and stabilizes between rounds 5 and 7.
- Group-level variance typically accounts for 20-50% of total cooperation variance.
- Factors increasing group variance include punishment, detailed feedback, small group size (≤4), and homogenous social preferences.
Conclusions:
- Group dynamics play a substantial and increasing role in shaping cooperation in PGGs.
- Specific game design elements (punishment, feedback) and group composition (size, homogeneity) can amplify group-level cooperation effects.
Related Concept Videos
04:49Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
01:37Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
01:31In- and Out-Groups
39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
00:52Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
01:55Egoism and Altruism
91.8K
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
91.8K
01:27Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
2.1K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
2.1K