Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Genome Annotation and Assembly

Genome Annotation and Assembly

The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

Genomic DNA in Eukaryotes

Genomic DNA in Eukaryotes

Eukaryotes have large genomes compared to prokaryotes. To fit their genomes into a cell, eukaryotic DNA is packaged extraordinarily tightly inside the nucleus. To achieve this, DNA is tightly wound around proteins called histones, which are packaged into nucleosomes that are joined by linker DNA and coil into chromatin fibers. Additional fibrous proteins further compact the chromatin, which is recognizable as chromosomes during certain phases of cell division.

Genomics

Genomics

Genomics is the science of genomes: it is the study of all the genetic material of an organism. In humans, the genome consists of information carried in 23 pairs of chromosomes in the nucleus, as well as mitochondrial DNA. In genomics, both coding and non-coding DNA is sequenced and analyzed. Genomics allows a better understanding of all living things, their evolution, and their diversity. It has a myriad of uses: for example, to build phylogenetic trees, to improve productivity and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Accurate <i>ab initio</i> gene prediction in eukaryotes with Tiberius in multiple clades.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Annotation of 200 Insect Genomes with BRAKER for Consistent Comparisons across Species.

Scientific data·2026

Same author

Classifying sex with volume-matched brain MRI.

Neuroimage. Reports·2025

Same author

Genomic map of the functionally extinct northern white rhinoceros (<i>Ceratotherium simum cottoni</i>).

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Same author

Tiberius: end-to-end deep learning with an HMM for gene prediction.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2024

Same author

learnMSA2: deep protein multiple alignments with large language and hidden Markov models.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2024

Same journal

Tracking Synthetic Adhesins on Bacterial Surfaces with Immunofluorescence Microscopy.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

Post-Selection Methods for Analyzing mRNA Display Selections and Optimization of Hits.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

High-Performance Computing in Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) Peptide Identification.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

Engineering and Adapting Disulfide-Containing Proteins to Enable Intracellular Functionality.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

AI-Driven Protein Research: From Prediction to Design.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same journal

Methods for the In Vitro Selection of Protein and Peptide Libraries Using mRNA Display.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics

Published on: June 17, 2012

Comparative Genome Annotation.

Stefanie Nachtweide¹, Lars Romoth², Mario Stanke³

¹Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)

|May 31, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Comparative genome annotation methods are reviewed to efficiently analyze newly sequenced genomes. These approaches leverage phylogenetic relationships for accurate gene structure identification in closely related species.

Keywords:

Annotation consistency Annotation mapping Clade annotation Gene prediction Multi-genome alignment

More Related Videos

Transcriptomic Analysis of C. elegans RNA Sequencing Data Through the Tuxedo Suite on the Galaxy Project

Transcriptomic Analysis of C. elegans RNA Sequencing Data Through the Tuxedo Suite on the Galaxy Project

Published on: April 8, 2017

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine

Published on: December 22, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics

Published on: June 17, 2012

Transcriptomic Analysis of C. elegans RNA Sequencing Data Through the Tuxedo Suite on the Galaxy Project

Transcriptomic Analysis of C. elegans RNA Sequencing Data Through the Tuxedo Suite on the Galaxy Project

Published on: April 8, 2017

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine

Published on: December 22, 2017

Area of Science:

Genomics
Bioinformatics
Comparative genomics

Background:

The rapid pace of genome sequencing generates vast amounts of data, with many new genomes being phylogenetically close to existing ones.
Simultaneous annotation of entire clades of closely related species or strains is often required.
Subsequent research frequently focuses on differences between closely related organisms, where shared gene structures are prevalent.

Purpose of the Study:

To review existing methods for comparative structural genome annotation.
To provide guidance on selecting appropriate methods based on phylogenetic context.
To offer practical advice for genome annotation workflows.

Main Methods:

Review of classical comparative annotation approaches, including protein sequence and profile alignment.
Examination of comparative gene prediction methods utilizing genome alignments for single or multiple target genomes.
Analysis of method dependency on phylogenetic placement of genomes.

Main Results:

Discussion on how phylogenetic proximity influences the choice and effectiveness of annotation methods.
Evaluation of the consistency of gene structure annotations across different methods.
Demonstration through an example case study.

Conclusions:

Comparative structural genome annotation is crucial for efficiently analyzing large sets of related genomes.
The selection of annotation methods should consider the phylogenetic relationships between genomes.
Practical insights are provided to improve general genome annotation practices.