Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Connecticut, 2013-2020
Reena Kapoor1, Bettina Viereck2, Hsiu-Ju Lin2
1Dr. Kapoor is an Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Dr. Baranoski and Dr. Norko are Professors of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Dr. Viereck is a Research Analyst, Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Hartford, CT, and a Lecturer at Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Dr. Lin is an Associate Research Professor, School of Social Work, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT. Dr. Swanson is a Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Dr. Easter is an Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. Dr. Zeoli is an Associate Professor, Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI. Dr. Frattaroli is a Professor at the Center for Gun Violence Solutions, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. reena.kapoor@yale.edu.
Abstract:
Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia have enacted Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) statutes, which allow temporary removal of firearms from individuals who pose an imminent risk of harm to themselves or others. Connecticut was the first state to enact such a law in 1999. The law's implementation and use between 1999 and 2013 were previously described, finding that ERPOs were pursued rarely for the first decade and that most orders were issued in response to concerns about suicide or self-harm rather than about interpersonal violence. The current study analyzes over 1,400 ERPOs in Connecticut between 2013 and 2020 in several domains: respondent demographics, circumstances leading to ERPO filing, type of threat (suicide, violence to others, or both), number and type of firearms removed, prevalence of mental illness and drug and alcohol use, and legal outcomes. Results are similar to the earlier study, indicating that ERPO respondents in Connecticut are primarily White, male, middle-aged residents of small towns and suburbs who pose a risk of harm to themselves (67.9%) more often than to others (42.8%). Significant gender differences between ERPO respondents are discussed, as are state-specific trends over time and differences between Connecticut and other states with published ERPO data.
More Related Videos
15:00Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
Published on: February 3, 2023
16:02Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Small Populations
Relative Risk
Birth Control Methods
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Censoring Survival Data
Probability Laws