Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Comparison of In-person Versus Online Comprehensive Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Program Following Prostatectomy
Dylan Hutchison1, Marieke K Jones2, Soutik Ghosal2
1Department of Urology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.
Online pelvic floor muscle training (oPFMT/PFE) and in-person training (iPFMT) show similar improvements in urinary incontinence (UI) and quality of life (QOL) after prostatectomy. This study highlights oPFMT/PFE as an accessible option for post-prostatectomy recovery.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Digital Health
Background:
- Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common complication following prostatectomy.
- Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and pelvic floor education (PFE) are effective for managing post-prostatectomy UI.
- Access to supervised in-person PFMT/PFE (iPFMT/PFE) can be limited by various barriers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of supervised in-person PFMT/PFE (iPFMT/PFE) versus an online PFMT/PFE (oPFMT/PFE) program for improving continence outcomes in men post-prostatectomy.
- To evaluate the feasibility and accessibility of a novel online program for PFMT/PFE delivery.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 41 men who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and participated in either iPFMT/PFE or oPFMT/PFE.
- Outcomes including UI (ICIQ-MLUTS SUI domain score - SDS), daily pad use (PPD), and quality of life (QOL - IIQ-7) were assessed at multiple time points up to 12 months post-surgery.
- Primary outcome was the change in SDS; secondary outcomes included PPD cure, SUI cure, and QOL scores.
Main Results:
- Both iPFMT/PFE and oPFMT/PFE groups showed significant improvements in UI and QOL over 12 months.
- While oPFMT/PFE group had slightly lower SDS scores at some time points, the rate of improvement was similar between groups.
- There were no significant differences in SUI cure rates (75% oPFMT/PFE vs. 60% iPFMT/PFE) or PPD and QOL scores between the two groups at 12 months.
Conclusions:
- Supervised in-person and online pelvic floor muscle training and education programs yield comparable significant improvements in urinary incontinence and quality of life for men after prostatectomy.
- The developed online program offers a viable and accessible alternative for PFMT/PFE delivery, potentially overcoming access barriers for patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure

