Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

05:57
A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique
Published on: January 6, 2023
2.3K
A new seven-axis robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system improves component positioning: a prospective,
Run Tian1, Xu Gao2, Ning Kong1
1Department of Bone and Joint, Xi'an Jiaotong University Second Affiliated Hospital, No.157, Xiwu Road, Xincheng District, Xi'an, 710004, Shaanxi, China.
Scientific Reports
|June 2, 2024
Summary
This study found that robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers improved acetabular cup positioning compared to conventional THA. While safe and effective, robotic assistance did not significantly alter clinical outcomes like the Harris Hip Score.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Robotics in Medicine
- Arthroplasty
Background:
- Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common procedure for hip joint diseases.
- Optimizing acetabular component placement is crucial for long-term THA success.
- Robotic-assisted surgery is emerging as a tool to enhance surgical precision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the radiologic and clinical outcomes of a novel seven-axis robotic-assisted THA (RAS) versus conventional THA (CON).
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the robotic system in THA.
- To assess the impact of robotic assistance on acetabular cup positioning, leg length discrepancy, and functional scores.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 104 patients undergoing THA.
- Patients were assigned to either the robotic-assisted THA group (RAS) or the conventional THA group (CON).
- Preoperative and postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS), acetabular inclination, anteversion, femoral offset, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were measured and compared.
Main Results:
- The RAS group demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of acetabular cups placed within the desired safety zone.
- Significant differences were observed in the mean absolute difference of acetabular inclination and anteversion between the groups.
- No significant differences were found in postoperative HHS, changes in HHS, femoral offset, or leg length between the RAS and CON groups.
- No robot-associated complications were reported during follow-up.
Conclusions:
- The seven-axis robotic-assisted THA system is safe and effective for hip arthroplasty.
- Robotic assistance leads to superior acetabular cup positioning compared to conventional THA.
- Clinical outcomes, including HHS and LLD, showed similar improvements in both robotic-assisted and conventional THA groups.

