Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Color Vision

Color Vision

Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Patterns of language and visuospatial lateralisation in three-year-old children.

Neuropsychologia·2026

Same author

Targeting intolerance of uncertainty in young children diagnosed with autism: A randomized controlled trial of a parent-mediated group intervention.

JCPP advances·2026

Same author

Measuring autistic burnout: A psychometric validation of the AASPIRE Autistic Burnout Measure in autistic adults.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice·2025

Same author

Psychometric evaluation of the Comprehensive Autistic Trait Inventory in autistic and non-autistic adults.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice·2025

Same author

Figure disembedding facility and reduced left visual field bias are linked to the social dimension of autistic traits.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025

Same author

First Impressions Towards Autistic People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2025

Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Auditory context-dependent distraction by unexpected visual stimuli.

Fabrice B R Parmentier^1,2,3, Michael English⁴, Murray T Maybery⁴

¹Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, Ctra. De Valldemossa, Km 7.5, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain. fabrice.parmentier@uib.es.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

|June 3, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Sensory predictions are influenced by environmental context. Unexpected stimuli within an auditory context slow down task performance, demonstrating auditory context-dependent attention modulation.

Keywords:

Attention Distraction Environmental context Oddball

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Auditory Perception

Background:

The deviance distraction effect occurs when task-irrelevant stimuli violate predictable patterns, slowing responses.
This effect is linked to the violation of sensory predictions made by the cognitive system.
Previous research has not explored if auditory environments can modulate these sensory predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether sensory predictions can be incidentally modulated by the auditory environment.
To examine context-dependent distraction in a categorization task.
To determine if auditory context influences attention.

Main Methods:

Participants performed a duration categorization task (short vs. long) on visual stimuli (colored shapes).
Visual features and background sounds (distinct chords) were manipulated.
Auditory contexts determined the probability of visual stimuli, creating expected and unexpected scenarios.

Main Results:

Participants responded significantly slower when stimuli were unexpected within a specific auditory context (context-dependent distraction).
Sensory prediction reset occurred after a change in auditory context.
This demonstrates auditory context-dependent modulation of attention.

Conclusions:

Object features and environmental context are processed interactively.
Sensory predictions are generated in relation to the environmental context.
This study provides the first evidence of auditory context-dependent attention modulation.