Gender- and Age-Related Characterization of Lower Eyelid Morphology: Three-Dimensional Analysis in a Chinese...

The lower eyelid region is a critical component of the face. It is essential to establish anthropometric reference values for the evaluation of aging, surgical planning and assessment of outcomes in periocular esthetic and rejuvenation procedures. This study aims to provide comprehensive anthropometric data on the Chinese lower eyelid region, into account factors such as sex and age, through three-dimensional imaging analysis.

Three-dimensional facial images were obtained from 84 healthy Chinese individuals aged between 20-35 and 50-65 years, as well as eight patients aged between 20 and 35 who presented with eyelid bags. A total of 27 landmarks were identified, leading to the generation of corresponding 21 lines, 5 curves, 4 angles, 2 areas and 5 ratios. The measurements were compared among different age groups, genders and young patients with or without eyelid bags.

Compared to females, males exhibited a more elongated palpebral fissure, lower tear trough and lid-cheek junction, smaller inner and outer canthus angles, as well as a larger area and proportion of the lower palpebral region. As age progressed, the height and width of the palpebral fissure and inner canthus angle decreased gradually, which was accompanied by sagging of the tear trough and lid-cheek junction, an increase in lower eyelid area and swelling of the lower eyelid. Young patients undergoing eyelid bags demonstrated larger and more swelling lower eyelid which held clinical significance for rejuvenation surgery.

Males exhibited a higher proportion of the brow-eye unit occupied by the lower eyelid region compared to females. Elderly individuals displayed noticeable drooping of the tear trough and lid-cheek junction, accompanied by swelling in the lower palpebral region. These findings can serve as standard references for esthetic procedures and reconstructive periocular operations.

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.