Developments in the Design, Conduct, and Reporting of Child Health Trials
Ami Baba1, Alex Aregbesola2,3, Patrina H Y Caldwell4
1Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Progress in pediatric clinical trial methods is slow, despite efforts by Standards for Research (StaR) in Child Health. Emerging trends like patient engagement and adaptive designs offer future improvements for child health research.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Clinical Trials
- Child Health Research Methods
Background:
- The Standards for Research (StaR) in Child Health network published initial standards in 2012 to improve pediatric clinical trials.
- A review of 247 publications highlighted research practices that add value and reduce waste in child health research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess progress in key pediatric trial methods areas.
- To identify emerging trends to enhance the clinical usefulness of pediatric trials.
Main Methods:
- Review of publications from StaR Child Health authors.
- Assessment of progress in areas including consent, bias, data monitoring, sample size, outcomes, and age groups.
- Exploration of emerging trends and implementation science approaches.
Main Results:
- Meaningful change has occurred, but measurable progress in pediatric trial methods remains slow.
- Key areas assessed include consent, bias, data monitoring, sample size, outcomes, and age groups.
Conclusions:
- Emerging trends such as patient engagement, Bayesian statistics, adaptive designs, and platform trials can advance pediatric research.
- Implementation science offers a framework for improving the design, conduct, and reporting of child health research.
Abstract:
To identify priority areas to improve the design, conduct, and reporting of pediatric clinical trials, the international expert network, Standards for Research (StaR) in Child Health, was assembled and published the first 6 Standards in Pediatrics in 2012. After a recent review summarizing the 247 publications by StaR Child Health authors that highlight research practices that add value and reduce research "waste," the current review assesses the progress in key child health trial methods areas: consent and recruitment, containing risk of bias, roles of data monitoring committees, appropriate sample size calculations, outcome selection and measurement, and age groups for pediatric trials. Although meaningful change has occurred within the child health research ecosystem, measurable progress is still disappointingly slow. In this context, we identify and review emerging trends that will advance the agenda of increased clinical usefulness of pediatric trials, including patient and public engagement, Bayesian statistical approaches, adaptive designs, and platform trials. We explore how implementation science approaches could be applied to effect measurable improvements in the design, conducted, and reporting of child health research.
More Related Videos
00:04A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Blinding
