Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

05:25
Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
A multicomponent intervention for pediatric readiness in general emergency departments: a single-blind, matched-pair
Leah K Crockett1,2, Motunrayo Ajayi1, Lisa Knisley1,3
1The Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, John Buhler Research Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
CJEM
|August 11, 2026
Summary
A multi-component intervention did not significantly improve pediatric readiness in general emergency departments. Further research into more intensive, context-specific strategies is needed to enhance care for children.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Pediatric Care
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- Pediatric readiness is crucial for improving outcomes and reducing mortality in children treated in emergency departments (EDs).
- Baseline assessments revealed significant gaps in pediatric readiness, particularly in coordination, staffing, training, and quality improvement domains.
- Targeted interventions are necessary to address these identified deficiencies in general EDs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component, context-informed intervention designed to enhance pediatric readiness in general EDs.
- To assess the impact of the intervention on the weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) in participating sites.
- To identify factors influencing changes in pediatric readiness following the intervention.
Main Methods:
- A single-blinded, matched-pair randomized controlled trial was conducted across 17 general EDs.
- Sites were randomized to receive either a multi-component intervention or a control (report only).
- Pediatric readiness was measured using the Canadian adaptation of the National Pediatric Readiness Survey, with WPRS as the primary outcome, analyzed using Welch's t tests and mixed-effects linear regression with Bayesian analyses.
Main Results:
- Sixteen EDs completed the study; the intervention group showed a mean decrease of -4.8 in WPRS, while the control group had a mean increase of +2.4.
- No statistically significant difference in WPRS change was observed between the intervention and control groups (p=0.4).
- Performance remained highest in patient safety and equipment/supplies, with quality improvement consistently being the lowest-scoring domain.
Conclusions:
- A low-intensity, multi-component intervention did not lead to significant improvements in pediatric readiness across general EDs.
- The substantial variation in site-level changes suggests that context-responsive and more intensive strategies may be required to effectively improve pediatric readiness.
- Future interventions should consider tailored approaches to address specific site needs and enhance care for pediatric patients in emergency settings.