Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

6.2K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
6.2K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

5.7K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
5.7K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.1K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.3K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.3K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.6K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.6K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genomic Landscapes of Endometrioid and Mucinous Ovarian Cancers and Morphologically Similar Tumor Types.

Cancer research communications·2025
Same author

Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of the Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Survival Decision Support Platform (BMETS-DSP): A Case-Based Pilot Assessment.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2022
Same author

Genomic Landscapes and Hallmarks of Mutant RAS in Human Cancers.

Cancer research·2022
Same author

Improving providers' survival estimates and selection of prognosis- and guidelines-appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic bone metastases: Development of the Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Survival Decision Support Platform.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2022
Same author

A transformation-free linear regression for compositional outcomes and predictors.

Biometrics·2021
Same author

External Validation of the Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Survival (BMETS) Machine Learning Model to Predict Survival in Patients With Symptomatic Bone Metastases.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2021
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Referees 2025.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

On exact randomization-based covariate-adjusted confidence intervals.

Jacob Fiksel1

  • 1Department of Data & Computational Sciences, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston 02210, United States.

Biometrics
|June 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a computationally efficient method for calculating covariate-adjusted confidence intervals in small, randomized experiments. This advancement makes randomization-based inference more accessible for analyzing non-normal data.

Keywords:
Fisher randomization testcovariate-adjustmentrandomization inferencerobust inference

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Experimental Design

Background:

  • Randomization-based inference and Fisher randomization tests are valuable for small experiments with non-normal outcomes.
  • Calculating confidence intervals via test inversion is computationally intensive, hindering practical application.
  • Existing methods for closed-form confidence intervals exist for simple difference-in-means but not for covariate-adjusted analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a closed-form expression for randomization-based covariate-adjusted confidence intervals.
  • To provide a verifiable condition ensuring correct coverage for these confidence intervals.
  • To overcome the computational burden associated with traditional methods for covariate-adjusted randomization inference.

Main Methods:

  • Extending the work of Zhu and Liu to derive a closed-form expression for covariate-adjusted confidence intervals.
  • Developing a sufficiency condition for correct coverage, checkable with observed data.
  • Conducting simulations to evaluate the performance and robustness of the proposed method.
  • Applying the method to re-analyze Phase I clinical trial data.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method yields randomization-based covariate-adjusted confidence intervals with correct coverage.
  • These intervals are robust to violations of normality assumptions.
  • The computational time is comparable to calculating Fisher-exact P-values, significantly faster than test inversion.
  • The method was successfully demonstrated on real-world clinical trial data.

Conclusions:

  • A computationally feasible method for randomization-based covariate-adjusted confidence intervals is now available.
  • This significantly lowers the barrier for applying robust statistical inference in small, randomized studies.
  • The approach enhances the utility of randomization tests, particularly in biostatistical and experimental settings.