Brain MRI Injury Patterns across Gestational Age among Preterm Infants with Perinatal Asphyxia

Corline E J Parmentier1, Loubna El Bakkali2, Elise A Verhagen2

  • 1Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Utrecht and Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Neonatology
|June 5, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Brain injury patterns in preterm infants with perinatal asphyxia (PA) vary by gestational age. Deep gray matter abnormalities on MRI are linked to poor neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal neurology
  • Pediatric neuroimaging
  • Perinatal medicine

Background:

  • Perinatal asphyxia (PA) poses significant risks to preterm infants.
  • Brain injury patterns in this population are not well-documented.
  • Understanding these patterns is crucial for predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in preterm infants experiencing PA.
  • To correlate these MRI findings with neurodevelopmental outcomes.
  • To analyze injury patterns based on gestational age groups.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective multicenter study of 119 preterm infants (GA 24.0-36.0 weeks) with PA.
  • Early MRI (<36 weeks postmenstrual age) and MRI at term-equivalent age (TEA) were analyzed.
  • Neurodevelopmental outcomes assessed at 18-24 months corrected age.

Main Results:

  • Early MRI revealed predominantly hemorrhagic injury in younger preterm infants (GA <32 weeks) and white matter/watershed injury in older preterm infants (GA ≥32 weeks).
  • MRI at TEA showed higher white matter scores in infants with GA 28.0-36.0 weeks.
  • Deep gray matter (DGM) injury on early MRI and DGM/white matter scores at TEA were significantly associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Brain injury patterns following PA in preterm infants are heterogeneous and depend on gestational age.
  • Deep gray matter abnormalities are particularly predictive of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in this cohort.
Abstract