Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Chromosome banding techniques for morphologically classified cells.

S Knuutila, M Keinänen

    Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics
    |January 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces a new staining method that allows researchers to examine both the structure of cells and their chromosomes at the same time. Traditional methods usually require separate steps for each type of analysis, which can be time-consuming. The described protocol uses a combination of cytochemical or immunologic methods to identify cells in mitosis. After destaining and acid fixation, cells are incubated in Søorensen buffer and stained with Giemsa to produce G- and C-banding. Fluorescent staining is used before Giemsa to detect sister chromatid exchanges. The results suggest that this approach enables efficient and accurate analysis of both cell morphology and chromosome banding in a single workflow.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Hyperspectral imaging for identification of irregular-shaped microplastics in water.

    The Science of the total environment·2024
    Same author

    Narcolepsy patients' blood-based miRNA expression profiling: miRNA expression differences with Pandemrix vaccination.

    Acta neurologica Scandinavica·2017
    Same author

    Influence of the marine feeding area on the muscle and egg fatty-acid composition of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar spawners estimated from the scale stable isotopes.

    Journal of fish biology·2017
    Same author

    Cytogenetic Findings and Survival in B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Second IWCCLL Compilation of Data on 662 Patients.

    Leukemia & lymphoma·2016
    Same author

    t(2;5) (p23;q35)-A Specific Chromosome Abnormality in Large Cell Anaplastic (Ki-1) Lymphoma.

    Leukemia & lymphoma·2016
    Same author

    The influence of timing on the effectiveness of epidural blood patches in parturients.

    International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2013

    Area of Science:

    • Cytogenetics
    • Cell morphology analysis
    • Chromosome staining techniques

    Background:

    Prior research has established methods for chromosome banding and sister chromatid exchange detection separately. However, integrating these techniques with cell morphology analysis remains limited. It was already known that traditional staining methods often require multiple steps and separate analyses. This gap motivated the development of a streamlined approach. No prior work had resolved the challenge of combining morphological and karyotypic analysis efficiently. Existing techniques typically focus on either morphology or karyotype, not both. That uncertainty drove the need for a unified method. This paper addresses that limitation by proposing a novel staining protocol.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The aim of this study is to develop a staining method that allows simultaneous analysis of cell morphology and karyotype. The specific problem is the lack of a unified technique for these analyses. The motivation stems from the need for more efficient diagnostic workflows. Current methods require separate procedures for morphology and karyotype. This approach increases time and complexity in cytogenetic analysis. The study proposes a solution using a single staining protocol. It focuses on integrating cytochemical and immunologic identification with banding techniques. The goal is to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in cytogenetics.

    Keywords:
    Chromosome bandingCell morphologyKaryotype analysisSister chromatid exchangesCytogenetic methods

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The protocol allows simultaneous analysis of cell morphology and karyotype using a single staining method.

    Fluorescent staining is used to detect sister chromatid exchanges before applying Giemsa for banding.

    The incubation is necessary to achieve optimal G- and C-banding patterns after Giemsa staining.

    Acid fixation preserves cell morphology without affecting the quality of chromosome banding.

    This method reduces multiple steps by integrating morphology and karyotype analysis into one protocol.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    Mitotic cells are identified using either cytochemical staining or immunologic methods. The cells are then subjected to a destaining process followed by acid fixation. For G- and C-banding, the cells are incubated overnight in Søorensen buffer at room temperature. Giemsa staining is applied after the incubation step. To detect sister chromatid exchanges, fluorescent staining is performed before Giemsa. The protocol ensures compatibility with both morphological and karyotypic assessments. The method avoids multiple separate staining steps. This approach allows for simultaneous analysis of cell structure and chromosome banding.

    Main Results:

    The described method successfully enables simultaneous analysis of cell morphology and karyotype. G- and C-banding patterns were clearly visible after Giemsa staining. Fluorescent staining before Giemsa effectively demonstrated sister chromatid exchanges. The overnight incubation in Søorensen buffer was critical for optimal banding. Acid fixation preserved cell morphology without compromising banding quality. Cytochemical and immunologic methods accurately identified mitotic cells. The protocol reduced the number of steps required for combined analysis. These results suggest the method is suitable for integrated cytogenetic studies.

    Conclusions:

    The authors propose that this staining protocol effectively combines cell morphology and karyotype analysis. The method allows for simultaneous examination without compromising either aspect. The overnight incubation in Søorensen buffer is essential for banding quality. Fluorescent staining before Giemsa is necessary for detecting sister chromatid exchanges. Acid fixation preserves cell structure while enabling banding. The study suggests this approach improves efficiency in cytogenetic analysis. It may be particularly useful in diagnostic settings requiring rapid assessments. The findings suggest this method could streamline workflows in clinical cytogenetics.

    The authors suggest this method could streamline cytogenetic workflows in diagnostic settings.