Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025
The Forced Swim Test as a Model of Depressive-like Behavior
Published on: March 2, 2015
A randomized controlled safety and feasibility trial of floatation-REST in anxious and depressed individuals
McKenna M Garland1,2, Raminta Wilson1, Wesley K Thompson1
1Laureate Institute for Brain Research, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Background:
Reduced Environmental Stimulation Therapy via floatation (floatation-REST) is a behavioral intervention designed to attenuate exteroceptive sensory input to the nervous system. Prior studies in anxious and depressed individuals demonstrated that single sessions of floatation-REST are safe, well-tolerated, and associated with an acute anxiolytic and antidepressant effect that persists for over 48 hours. However, the feasibility of using floatation-REST as a repeated intervention in anxious and depressed populations has not been well-investigated.
Methods:
In this single-blind safety and feasibility trial, 75 individuals with anxiety and depression were randomized to complete six sessions of floatation-REST in different formats: pool-REST (weekly 1-hour float sessions), pool-REST preferred (float sessions with flexibility of duration and frequency), or an active comparator (chair-REST; weekly 1-hour sessions in a Zero Gravity chair). Feasibility (primary outcome) was assessed via an 80% rate of adherence to the assigned intervention; tolerability via study dropout and duration/frequency of REST utilization; and safety via incidence of adverse events and ratings about the effects of REST.
Results:
Of 1,715 individuals initially screened, 75 participants were ultimately randomized. Six-session adherence was 85% for pool-REST (mean, M = 5.1 sessions; standard deviation, SD = 1.8), 89% for pool-REST preferred (M = 5.3 sessions; SD = 1.6), and 74% for chair-REST (M = 4.4 sessions; SD = 2.5). Dropout rates at the end of the intervention did not differ significantly between the treatment conditions. Mean session durations were 53.0 minutes (SD = 12.3) for pool-REST, 75.4 minutes (SD = 29.4) for pool-REST preferred, and 58.4 minutes (SD = 4.3) for chair-REST. There were no serious adverse events associated with any intervention. Positive experiences were endorsed more commonly than negative ones and were also rated at higher levels of intensity.
Conclusions:
Six sessions of floatation-REST appear feasible, well-tolerated, and safe in anxious and depressed individuals. Floatation-REST induces positively-valenced experiences with few negative effects. Larger randomized controlled trials evaluating markers of clinical efficacy are warranted.
Clinical Trial Registration Identifier:
NCT03899090.
