Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

The Helsinki Rat Microsurgical Sidewall Aneurysm Model
Published on: October 12, 2014
Numerical investigation on the impact of different coronary aneurysms morphologies on thrombus formation and
Kaiyue Zhang1, Pan Song2, Yan Pei1
1Department of Computer Science and Technology, Southwest University of Science and Technology, No. 59, Middle of Qinglong Avenue, Fucheng District, Mianyang, 621010, China.
Insights
Saccular coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) show higher risk of rupture due to flow stagnation. Fusiform CAAs, however, pose a greater risk of early obstruction from thrombosis, warranting clinical concern.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Research
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are classified as saccular or fusiform.
- Clinical understanding of thrombosis risk in different CAA morphologies remains controversial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate thrombus growth trends in saccular versus fusiform CAAs.
- To assess long-term complication risks using hemodynamic parameters.
Main Methods:
- Reconstruction of two CAA morphologies from computed tomography angiography (CTA) data.
- Analysis of wall shear stress (WSS) and helicity indicators.
- Application of a thrombus growth model for different CAA morphologies.
Main Results:
- Most WSS indicators showed no significant difference between saccular and fusiform CAAs.
- Saccular CAAs exhibited significantly higher relative residence time (RRT) due to helical flow and stagnation.
- Fusiform CAAs showed potential for earlier main coronary flow channel obstruction by thrombus.
Conclusions:
- Higher RRT in saccular CAAs may increase risks of dilatation or rupture.
- Fusiform CAAs may present a greater clinical concern for early obstruction due to thrombosis.
- Hemodynamic analysis aids in understanding CAA morphology-specific risks.
Abstract:
Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are morphologically classified as saccular and fusiform. There is still a great deal of clinical controversy as to which types of CAA are more likely to cause thrombosis. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the trend of thrombus growth in CAAs with different morphologies and to assess the risk of possible long-term complications based on hemodynamic parameters. Utilizing computed tomography angiography (CTA) data from eight healthy coronary arteries, two distinct morphologies of coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) were reconstructed. Distribution of four wall shear stress (WSS)-based indicators and three helicity indicators was analyzed in this study. Meanwhile, a thrombus growth model was introduced to analyze the thrombus formation in CAAs with different morphologies. The research results showed the distribution of most WSS indicators between saccular and fusiform CAAs was not statistically significant. However, due to the presence of a more pronounced helical flow pattern, irregular helical flow structure and longer time of flow stagnation in saccular CAAs during the cardiac cycle, the mean and maximum relative residence time (RRT) were significantly higher in saccular CAAs than in fusiform CAAs (P < 0.05). This may increase the risk of saccular coronary arteries leading to aneurysmal dilatation or even rupture. Although the two CAAs had similar rates of thrombosis, fusiform CAAs may more early cause obstruction of the main coronary flow channel where the aneurysm is located due to thrombosis growth. Thus, the risk of thrombosis in fusiform coronary aneurysms may warrant greater clinical concern.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

