Thermoelectric Properties of CrS2- Te (x: 0, 1, 2) Dichalcogenides Monolayers: First-Principles Study
Farva Tufail1,2, Abdull Farooq2, Altaf Ur Rahman2
1School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Sciences and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, People's Republic of China.
Abstract:
In this study, we conducted first-principles calculations interfaced with Boltzmann transport theory to examine the carrier-dependent thermoelectric properties of CrS2- Te (x: 0, 1, 2) dichalcogenides monolayers. We conducted a systematic analysis of the structural, phonon band structures, elastic properties, electronic structures, and thermoelectric properties, of electron (e) and hole (h) doped CrS2- Te (x: 0, 1, 2) dichalcogenides monolayers. The studied 2D TMDCs exhibit structural stability, as indicated by the negative formation energy. Additionally, the phonon band structures indicate no negative frequencies along any wave vector, confirming the dynamic stability of the CrS2- Te monolayers. CrS2 and CrTe2 monolayers are semiconductors with direct bandgaps of 1.01 and 0.67 eV, respectively. A Janus CrSTe monolayer has a smaller bandgap of 0.21 eV. Temperatures range between 300 and 500 K, and concentrations of e(h) doped in the range of 1.0 × 1018-1.0 × 1020 cm-3 are used to compute the thermoelectric transport coefficients. The low lattice thermal conductivity is predicted for the studied compounds, among which Janus CrSTe and CrTe2 have the minimum value of κlat ≈ 1 W/mK @ 700 K. The figure-of-merit ZT projected value at the optimal e(h) doping concentration for the CrS2 monolayer is as high as 0.07 (0.09) at 500 K. Our findings demonstrate how to design improved thermoelectric materials suitable for various thermoelectric devices.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...


