Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
Published on: June 8, 2018
Robust Spectral π Pairing in the Random-Field Floquet Quantum Ising Model
Harald Schmid1, Alexander-Georg Penner1, Kang Yang1
1Dahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
This study reveals that π pairings in the Floquet quantum Ising model are robust against longitudinal disorder, unlike zero pairings. This finding has implications for quantum information processing and superconducting quantum processors.
Area of Science:
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Quantum Information Science
- Many-Body Physics
Background:
- Superconducting quantum processors and the quantum Ising model are key areas of quantum information research.
- Understanding spectral properties, such as level pairings, is crucial for quantum device performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate level pairings in the many-body spectrum of the random-field Floquet quantum Ising model.
- To analyze the impact of transverse and longitudinal disorder on Majorana zero and π modes.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing Jordan-Wigner fermions to represent the spin model.
- Applying self-consistent Floquet perturbation theory.
- Analyzing log-normal distributions of level splittings.
Main Results:
- Identified Majorana zero and π modes as the source of level pairings.
- Observed log-normal distributions for both zero and π splittings under transverse fields.
- Demonstrated that longitudinal fields lift zero pairings rapidly while π pairings show remarkable robustness.
Conclusions:
- The distinct behaviors of zero and π pairings under longitudinal disorder are explained.
- The robustness of π pairings suggests potential applications in quantum information processing.
- Findings are motivated by experiments on superconducting quantum processors.
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Fermi Level Dynamics
Electron affinity in semiconductors refers to the energy gap between the minimum of its conduction band and the vacuum level and it is a critical parameter in determining how easily a semiconductor can accept additional electrons.
The work...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Molecular Orbital Theory II

