Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Religiosity, Financial Risk Taking, and Reward Processing: An Experimental Study
Frederique J Vanheusden1, Sundara Kashyap Vadapalli2, Mamunur Rashid3
1Department of Engineering, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, New Hall Block, Room 177, Clifton Campus, Clifton Lane, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK. frederique.vanheusden@ntu.ac.uk.
None:
The present study investigated the extent to which financial risk-taking (FRT) perspectives and religiosity influenced an individual's performance on financial decision-making tasks under risk and/or uncertainty. It further investigated the potential to measure this interaction using electro-encephalogram (EEG) assessments through reward-related event-related potentials (P3 and FRN). EEG data were collected from 37 participants undergoing four decision-making tasks comprising the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), Iowa Gambling Test (IGT), Mixed-Gamble Loss-Aversion Task (MGLAT), and MGLA-Success Task (MGLAST). The present study found that BART performance may be affected by an interaction of FRT perspectives and religiosity. The physiological effects of task feedback were also distinguished between religious and non-religious individuals objectively with EEG data. Overall, while religiosity and FRT may not significantly influence IGT and MGLA performance, and interact with BART in a complex way, physiological reaction towards feedback after BART performance appears to be strongly affected by religiosity and FRT perspectives.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Fundamental Attribution Error
Social Proof
Naturalistic Observations

