Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stimulants01:29

Stimulants

186
Stimulants are substances that enhance neural activity and elevate dopamine levels in the brain, leading to their highly addictive nature. These drugs include cocaine, amphetamines, MDMA, caffeine, and nicotine, each with distinct mechanisms of action and varied health implications.
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
186

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychedelic Use, Microdosing, Motives, and Information and Product Sources Among Young Adults in the United States.

Journal of psychoactive drugs·2026
Same author

Connect Kits for Family Action: Intervention Development and Exploratory Data Analysis of Proximal Outcomes.

Journal of child & adolescent substance use·2026
Same author

Mystery shopper assessments of cannabis retailer practices and regulatory compliance in five U.S. states, 2025.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2026
Same author

Impact of Simple Versus Complex Cannabis Advertising Messages and Warnings on US Young Adults' Product Perceptions.

Substance use & addiction journal·2026
Same author

Characteristics of People Who Inject Drugs Approached for Injection Assistance in Rural Kentucky.

Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs·2026
Same author

Retail Availability of Intoxicating Cannabis and Mushroom Products Across Eleven U.S. Cities: Sales Persist Despite Prohibitions.

Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies
08:39

Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies

Published on: August 25, 2018

25.5K

Hidden flaws in e-cigarette industry-funded studies.

Eric K Soule1,2, Matthew E Rossheim3, Melvin D Livingston4

  • 1Department of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA soulee18@ecu.edu.

Tobacco Control
|June 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) research funded by the tobacco industry may contain methodological flaws leading to biased conclusions. Independent experts and journals should scrutinize industry-funded e-cigarette studies to ensure scientific integrity.

Keywords:
cessationelectronic nicotine delivery devicesnicotinetobacco industry

More Related Videos

Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
10:44

Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System

Published on: May 24, 2017

11.5K
A Microcontroller Operated Device for the Generation of Liquid Extracts from Conventional Cigarette Smoke and Electronic Cigarette Aerosol
09:30

A Microcontroller Operated Device for the Generation of Liquid Extracts from Conventional Cigarette Smoke and Electronic Cigarette Aerosol

Published on: January 18, 2018

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies
08:39

Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies

Published on: August 25, 2018

25.5K
Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
10:44

Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System

Published on: May 24, 2017

11.5K
A Microcontroller Operated Device for the Generation of Liquid Extracts from Conventional Cigarette Smoke and Electronic Cigarette Aerosol
09:30

A Microcontroller Operated Device for the Generation of Liquid Extracts from Conventional Cigarette Smoke and Electronic Cigarette Aerosol

Published on: January 18, 2018

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Toxicology
  • Scientific Integrity

Background:

  • Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use has risen significantly over the past two decades.
  • Understanding e-cigarette health risks and benefits is crucial for public health policy and education.
  • Industry-funded research, particularly from the tobacco sector, warrants careful examination for potential bias.

Discussion:

  • Tobacco and e-cigarette industry-funded studies often present findings that conflict with independent research.
  • Methodological flaws in industry-sponsored research can lead to misleading conclusions supporting commercial interests.
  • The historical precedent of the tobacco industry using biased research to influence policy necessitates scrutiny of current e-cigarette industry funding.

Key Insights:

  • Specific examples of tobacco/e-cigarette industry-funded research demonstrate methodological flaws and biased outcomes.
  • Industry-funded e-cigarette studies may mirror past tactics used by the tobacco industry to shape public perception and policy.
  • A critical assessment of industry-funded e-cigarette research is needed to identify and mitigate potential biases.

Outlook:

  • Independent subject matter experts must rigorously evaluate research funded by the tobacco and e-cigarette industries.
  • Journals should consider implementing policies to exclude manuscripts that have received financial support from these industries.
  • Ensuring the objectivity of e-cigarette research is paramount for accurate health guidance and effective public policy.