Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Benefits and durability of an affordable prosthetic silicone cushion liner locally manufactured in a resource-limited environment: Enabling adoption of total surface bearing sockets and silicone cushion liners.

Prosthetics and orthotics international·2025
Same author

Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup.

Prosthetics and orthotics international·2023
Same author

Toward standardized methods for prosthetic socket mechanical testing.

Prosthetics and orthotics international·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2025

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.3K

3D Printed Prostheses: The Path from Hype to Reality.

J Erenstone1

  • 1Mountain Orthotic and Prosthetics Services, Lake Placid, NY USA.

Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal
|June 14, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

3D printing technology, particularly for prostheses, experienced a hype cycle with unrealistic expectations. The industry is now maturing, moving beyond limitations to a sustainable growth phase for future development.

Keywords:
3D PrintingAdditive ManufacturingDigital WorkflowOrthoticsProstheticsRehabilitation

More Related Videos

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.4K
Rapid and Low-cost Prototyping of Medical Devices Using 3D Printed Molds for Liquid Injection Molding
10:43

Rapid and Low-cost Prototyping of Medical Devices Using 3D Printed Molds for Liquid Injection Molding

Published on: June 27, 2014

19.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2025

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.3K
3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.4K
Rapid and Low-cost Prototyping of Medical Devices Using 3D Printed Molds for Liquid Injection Molding
10:43

Rapid and Low-cost Prototyping of Medical Devices Using 3D Printed Molds for Liquid Injection Molding

Published on: June 27, 2014

19.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science
  • Additive Manufacturing

Background:

  • 3D printing technology has evolved over 40 years, gaining significant traction in the last 15 years due to patent expirations and open innovation.
  • Interest in 3D printed prostheses surged, mirroring the Gartner Hype Cycle, with companies leveraging popular claims for growth.
  • Unrealistic expectations arose from early-stage technological limitations, leading to a period of disillusionment within the industry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a historical perspective on 3D printing technology, particularly concerning prostheses.
  • To differentiate between popular misconceptions and the actual capabilities of 3D printing.
  • To offer insights for present technology application and future development, applicable globally.

Main Methods:

  • Historical analysis of 3D printing adoption and its associated hype cycles.
  • Critical evaluation of popular claims versus technological realities in 3D printed prostheses.
  • Review of industry trends and advancements beyond initial limitations.

Main Results:

  • The field of 3D printing, especially for prosthetics, has navigated a hype cycle characterized by inflated expectations and subsequent disillusionment.
  • Current industry trends indicate a move beyond early limitations, suggesting a more sustainable and realistic advancement trajectory.
  • The historical context reveals valuable lessons for assessing current applications and guiding future innovations.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding the history of 3D printing misconceptions is crucial for discerning its true value.
  • The industry is transitioning towards a mature and sustainable development phase.
  • Lessons learned are applicable to both high- and low-income countries, informing future recommendations.