Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
Published on: October 6, 2023
Communication and collaboration skills training in radiation oncology: A quantitative validation survey
Matthew Charles Knox1,2,3, Diana Naehrig3,4, Yaw Sinn Chin2,5
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Wentworthville, New South Wales, Australia.
Introduction:
Communication and collaboration are integral in radiation oncology practice. A recently published qualitative study identified several deficiencies in skills development for Australian/New Zealand trainees. We aim to validate these findings to guide curriculum development.
Methods:
A quantitative survey was developed through an iterative process, using themes identified in the previous qualitative investigation. This survey was distributed to radiation oncologists and trainees across Australia and New Zealand via email. Data collection and management utilised the REDCap system. Question types varied to maximise richness of data, including ranking, likert-scales and free-text questions. Results are primarily reported descriptively.
Results:
Totally 35 participants submitted completed survey responses with broad representation across geography, gender and clinician seniority. To learn communication, participants reported strong preferences towards informal observation (60% agreement) and self-reflection (49% agreement), and against online learning (77% disagreement) methodologies. Nearly 35% acknowledge poor communication at least weekly, with time pressure being a major barrier (63% agreement). Clinical uncertainty and existing patient/family assumptions (both 74% agreement) contribute to difficulties in breaking bad news, with online learning being the only negatively perceived training modality (23% agreement). No participants reported any formal training/mentoring in multi-disciplinary team (MDT) engagement. Conflict was commonly witnessed/experienced (97%) and 26% of participants avoid MDTs due to difficulties experienced.
Conclusions:
This study validates the themes previously identified. We identified a strong preference for informal learning methodologies and against online modules, discordant to published literature. Effective collaboration within MDTs is identified as a particular area of need. We recommend future curriculum modification considers these results to maximise efficacy.
More Related Videos
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
08:25Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018