Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
Published on: March 19, 2020
Effects of balance constraints during a double-step reaching task
Christopher Moya-Jofré1, Juan José Mariman2, Trinidad Bruna-Melo3
1Neurorehabilitation and Motor Control Lab, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Chile; Biomechanics Laboratory, Physical Therapy, Hospital del Trabajador, Chile; Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Physical Therapy, Universidad Santo Tomas, Chile.
Background:
In daily life tasks of the upper limb, we must make quick corrections with our hands in unstable postural situations. Postural and reaching control mechanisms are involved in the accurate execution of upper-limb tasks.
Research Question:
This research aimed to determine the effect of different postural stability conditions on the motor performance of the upper limb in a reaching task with non-static targets.
Methodology:
19 young participants performed a reaching task toward targets that exhibited a change in position (at 200 or 600 ms) in different postural conditions (bipedal-firm, bipedal-foam, and unipedal-foam surface). Performance on the screen (motion time and spatial error), balance (center of pressure displacements, CoP), and index finger movements were recorded during the reaching task.
Results:
The instability affects the finger kinematic (displacements) and CoP kinematic (displacements, speed, and smoothness) without affecting the performance on the screen (precision and duration). The timing of target change affects the performance on the screen, finger kinematic (speed and smoothness), and CoP kinematic (displacements, speed, and smoothness).
Significance:
Postural and reaching control systems enable accurate hand motions in less stable situations, even in reaching tasks with non-static targets. The postural and reaching control systems can protect the end-effector performance during unstable conditions but not during trials with less time to correct the motion.
Related Concept Videos
Constraints and Statical Determinacy
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?

