Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical and genomic predictors of sipuleucel-T outcomes in men with metastatic androgen pathway modulator resistant prostate cancer.

Research square·2026
Same author

Mechanics of Long-Shank 5 mm Neural Probe Insertion into the Rat Brain: Effects of Geometry and Vibration-Assisted Insertion.

Micromachines·2026
Same author

Seventy-Five Years of NIH NIDDK Funding Has Increased Knowledge and Greatly Impacted Clinical Care.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2026
Same author

Temporally Delayed Deployment of Photo-Responsive Liquid Crystal Polymer Networks Toward Neural Interfaces.

Advanced healthcare materials·2026
Same author

Social Media Use by Orthopaedic Surgery Professional Societies.

Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances·2026
Same author

Experimental Characterisation of the Anisotropic Behaviour of the Different Tissue Layers of Human Abdominal Wall.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
14:14

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Published on: August 12, 2018

8.9K

NeurostimML: a machine learning model for predicting neurostimulation-induced tissue damage.

Yi Li1,2, Rebecca A Frederick3, Daniel George4

  • 1Department of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States of America.

Journal of Neural Engineering
|June 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new machine learning model accurately predicts neural tissue damage from electrical stimulation, improving safety in neuromodulation research and clinical applications. This approach considers more parameters than previous methods.

Keywords:
Shannon equationmachine learningneuromodulationsafe stimulation

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Insight Into Innovations in Spinal Cord Injury Research
06:31

Author Spotlight: Insight Into Innovations in Spinal Cord Injury Research

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.9K
A Neurosphere Assay to Evaluate Endogenous Neural Stem Cell Activation in a Mouse Model of Minimal Spinal Cord Injury
09:08

A Neurosphere Assay to Evaluate Endogenous Neural Stem Cell Activation in a Mouse Model of Minimal Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
14:14

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Published on: August 12, 2018

8.9K
Author Spotlight: Insight Into Innovations in Spinal Cord Injury Research
06:31

Author Spotlight: Insight Into Innovations in Spinal Cord Injury Research

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.9K
A Neurosphere Assay to Evaluate Endogenous Neural Stem Cell Activation in a Mouse Model of Minimal Spinal Cord Injury
09:08

A Neurosphere Assay to Evaluate Endogenous Neural Stem Cell Activation in a Mouse Model of Minimal Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Predicting electrical stimulation-induced neural tissue damage is crucial for safe neuromodulation.
  • Existing methods rely on limited stimulation parameters, reducing prediction accuracy.
  • A more comprehensive approach is needed to enhance the reliability of tissue damage prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a machine learning (ML) model for more reliable prediction of electrical stimulation-induced neural tissue damage.
  • To incorporate a wider range of stimulation parameters into the predictive model.
  • To compare the ML model's performance against the traditional Shannon equation.

Main Methods:

  • Compiled a database of 387 stimulation parameter combinations from 58 studies spanning 47 years.
  • Utilized ordinal encoding and random forest for feature selection.
  • Investigated four ML models (Logistic Regression, K-nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, Multilayer Perceptron) for classification and compared them to the Shannon equation.

Main Results:

  • The Random Forest model selected 12 key features, including waveform shape, pulse width, frequency, and various charge and current densities.
  • The Shannon equation achieved 63.9% accuracy.
  • The Random Forest algorithm demonstrated a significantly higher accuracy of 88.3% in predicting tissue damage.

Conclusions:

  • The developed Random Forest model offers a robust and accurate method for predicting neural tissue damage from electrical stimulation.
  • This ML-driven approach facilitates informed decision-making for neuromodulation parameter selection in research and clinical settings.
  • This study pioneers the use of ML for predicting stimulation-induced neural tissue damage, paving the way for ML-driven neurostimulation.