Impact of leaflet splitting on coronary access after redo-TAVI for degenerated supra-annular self-expanding platforms
Alessandro Beneduce1, Arif A Khokhar2,3, Jonathan Curio4
1Heart Valve Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Insights
Leaflet splitting (LS) significantly improves coronary access (CA) feasibility after redo-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in challenging anatomies. This technique is crucial for enabling subsequent CA in patients with degenerated self-expanding valves.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular interventions
- Structural heart disease
- Medical device technology
Background:
- Coronary access (CA) poses a significant challenge during redo-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly with failing supra-annular self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs).
- Ensuring safe and feasible coronary access is critical for patient outcomes in redo-TAVI procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of leaflet splitting (LS) in improving subsequent coronary access (CA) after redo-TAVI.
- To assess LS benefit in anatomies identified as high-risk for unfeasible CA.
Main Methods:
- Utilized ex vivo, patient-specific 3D-printed models for TAVI simulations.
- Performed index TAVI with supra-annular self-expanding valves (ACURATE neo2 or Evolut PRO) at varying commissural misalignment (CMA).
- Conducted redo-TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve (SAPIEN 3 Ultra) at different depths, assessing selective CA before and after LS in a pulsatile flow simulator.
Main Results:
- Overall CA feasibility significantly increased from 18.7% to 60.9% after LS (p<0.001).
- LS enabled CA up to 45° CMA for ACURATE neo2 and 30° CMA for Evolut PRO TAV-1.
- The combination of LS and a low SAPIEN 3 Ultra implant depth yielded the highest CA feasibility in redo-TAVI scenarios.
Conclusions:
- Leaflet splitting (LS) substantially enhances coronary access feasibility in high-risk anatomies undergoing redo-TAVI for degenerated supra-annular self-expanding platforms.
- Individualized treatment decisions for redo-TAVI should incorporate the anticipated benefits of LS on coronary access for specific patient anatomies.
Background:
Coronary access (CA) is a major concern in redo-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for failing supra-annular self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs).
Aims:
This ex vivo study evaluated the benefit of leaflet splitting (LS) on subsequent CA after redo-TAVI in anatomies deemed at high risk of unfeasible CA.
Methods:
Ex vivo, patient-specific models were printed three-dimensionally. Index TAVI was performed using ACURATE neo2 or Evolut PRO (TAV-1) at the standard implant depth and with different degrees of commissural misalignment (CMA). Redo-TAVI was performed using the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 Ultra (TAV-2) at different implant depths with commissural alignment. Selective CA was attempted for each configuration before and after LS in a pulsatile flow simulator. The leaflet splay area was assessed on the bench.
Results:
In matched comparisons of 128 coronary cannulations across 64 redo-TAVI configurations, the overall feasibility of CA significantly increased after LS (60.9% vs 18.7%; p<0.001). The effect of LS varied according to the sinotubular junction height, TAV-1 design, TAV-1 CMA, and TAV-2 implant depth, given TAV-2 alignment. LS enabled CA for up to CMA 45° with the ACURATE neo2 TAV-1 and up to CMA 30° with the Evolut PRO TAV-1. The combination of LS and a low TAV-2 implant provided the highest feasibility of CA after redo-TAVI. The leaflet splay area ranged from 25.60 mm2 to 37.86 mm2 depending on the TAV-1 platform and TAV-2 implant depth.
Conclusions:
In high-risk anatomies, LS significantly improves CA feasibility after redo-TAVI for degenerated supra-annular self-expanding platforms. Decisions on redo-TAVI feasibility should be carefully individualised, taking into account the expected benefit of LS on CA for each scenario.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care


