Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.1K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.2K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.2K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

549
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
549
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

677
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
677
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

516
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
516
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

117
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
117

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Novel Method for Early Gear Pitting Fault Diagnosis Using Stacked SAE and GBRBM.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2019
Same author

A monitoring-modeling approach to SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> secondary conversion ratio estimation during haze periods in Beijing, China.

Journal of environmental sciences (China)·2019
Same author

Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Fixation of Stable Versus Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

Orthopedics·2019
Same author

E-cadherin is Required for the Homeostasis of Lgr5<sup>+</sup> Gastric Antral Stem Cells.

International journal of biological sciences·2019
Same author

Development of a real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay for the rapid detection of Salmonella spp. from food.

Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]·2019
Same author

Conjugated Microporous Polymers with Tunable Electronic Structure for High-Performance Potassium-Ion Batteries.

ACS nano·2019
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
09:17

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding

Published on: March 28, 2025

767

An Advanced Tool Wear Forecasting Technique with Uncertainty Quantification Using Bayesian Inference and Support

Zhiming Rong1, Yuxiong Li2, Li Wu2

  • 1Applied Technology College, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 19, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method for predicting cutting tool wear, incorporating uncertainty quantification. The approach improves prediction accuracy and stability for industrial applications.

Keywords:
bayesian inferencebrownian motioncutting tool wear predictionsupport vector regressionuncertainty quantification

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
08:27

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.0K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
09:17

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding

Published on: March 28, 2025

767
Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
08:27

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.0K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Manufacturing Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Tool wear prediction is crucial for industrial production efficiency.
  • Existing machine learning methods often neglect random uncertainty factors in tool wear estimation.
  • There is a need for more robust and accurate tool wear prediction techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel method for predicting cutting tool wear with uncertainty quantification.
  • To address the limitations of current machine learning-based tool wear prediction methods.
  • To enhance the accuracy and stability of in-advance tool wear predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling degradation features using Brownian motion stochastic process.
  • Training a Support Vector Regression (SVR) model to map features to tool wear.
  • Employing Bayesian inference for online parameter updates and future feature trend estimation.
  • Predicting tool wear as distribution densities using simulation samples.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively models tool wear degradation with uncertainty.
  • In-advance prediction of cutting tool wear was achieved in the form of distribution densities.
  • Experimental validation demonstrated superior prediction accuracy and stability compared to existing methods.

Conclusions:

  • The novel method offers a significant advancement in cutting tool wear prediction.
  • Incorporating stochastic processes and Bayesian inference enhances prediction reliability.
  • The approach provides valuable insights for proactive maintenance and optimized manufacturing processes.