The Ross Operation Over 55 Years Later: Comparing Surgical Techniques and Outcomes

The Ross procedure is often considered the best option for a small group of patients. Some critics argue that harvesting the pulmonary artery again can cause problems, such as exposing the native pulmonary autograft to systemic pressures and requiring further intervention. However, the pulmonary autograft is a living tissue that can adjust to growing conditions and undergo remodelling. The pathophysiology of living tissue, harvesting techniques, indications for use of pulmonary autograft in aortic valve disease, contraindications, and variations of pulmonary autograft as an aortic conduit are discussed in this seminar. Following recent updates from high-volume centres, the indications, contraindications, techniques, and variations of pulmonary autograft as an aortic conduit and, in the absence of substantial well-designed randomised controlled trials, areas where the Ross procedure needs to be reaffirmed as part of the surgical armamentarium are also discussed. Furthermore, increasing evidence suggests that the Ross procedure produces better long-term results than traditional aortic valve replacement in young and middle-aged adults. To enable cardiologists and surgeons to make appropriate decisions for their patients with aortic valve disease, the author provides a complete review of the most recent published studies on the Ross procedure.