Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Legal Guidelines for Documentation01:06

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

1.3K
The legal guidelines for nursing documentation are essential for ensuring accurate, professional, and ethical recording of patient care. The guidelines are discussed here:
1.3K
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II01:23

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II

699
Establishing a secure, collaborative nurse-patient relationship is crucial for delivering high-quality care. This relationship, founded on trust, respect, and honesty, enhances the patient's comfort and willingness to share vital health information. For example, a nurse who listens actively and without judgment provides clear information about health conditions and treatment options and respects patient decisions, which builds a trusting relationship.
Communication between nurses and...
699
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

894
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
894
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III01:16

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III

645
Nurse-to-nurse relationships are legally required to adhere to professional standards, ensuring a respectful and positive working environment. Professional conduct demands that nurses treat all colleagues respectfully and courteously, fostering a productive, supportive workplace. Nurses must actively eliminate bullying, discrimination, and harassment to maintain a safe and inclusive environment.
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
645
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I01:27

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I

730
In healthcare, informed consent is a crucial process that involves thoroughly communicating medical treatment options to patients, including benefits, risks, potential side effects, and alternatives. This process enables patients to make well-informed decisions about their care, ensuring they understand the implications of their choices before consenting to or refusing treatment.
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
730
Competition02:34

Competition

21.5K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
21.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The first step in visual diagnosis: a study of novices developing the ability to distinguish normal from abnormal cases.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2025
Same author

Advancing Rural Generalist Training: The Northern Regional Integrated Clerkship, a Blended Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship Innovation in Northern British Columbia.

Advances in medical education and practice·2025
Same author

Check, Please! Supervisor-Learner Dyads Using "Checking" for Clinical Support During Indirect Supervision.

Journal of general internal medicine·2024
Same author

"Praise in Public; Criticize in Private": Unwritable Assessment Comments and the Performance Information That Resists Being Written.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2024
Same author

The best of both worlds: Assessing trainee progression in the era of competency based medical education.

Medical education·2024
Same author

"Juggle the different hats we wear": enacted strategies for negotiating boundaries in overlapping relationships.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2023
Same journal

Channelling Socrates to re-imagine asynchronous online learning.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Moving beyond tokenism: A structured and intentional approach to embedding health advocacy in medical education.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When I say … 'in situ simulation'.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Examiner training and calibration for simulated clinical examinations: A scoping review.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When systems set the limits of supervision.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

From psychometrics to partnerships: Broadening what counts as validity evidence.

Medical education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Determination of the Mechanical Properties of Flexible Connectors for Use in Insulated Concrete Wall Panels
05:26

Determination of the Mechanical Properties of Flexible Connectors for Use in Insulated Concrete Wall Panels

Published on: October 19, 2022

1.6K

Not in the file: How competency committees work with undocumented contributions.

Anneke van Enk1, Graham MacDonald2, Rose Hatala3

  • 1Centre for Health Education Scholarship, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Medical Education
|June 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Undocumented contributions in competence committees (CCs) support, rather than replace, formal documentation. These informal insights, particularly in less procedural specialties, aid decision-making by contextualizing trainee performance data.

More Related Videos

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.2K
CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing
08:23

CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing

Published on: November 1, 2024

594

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Determination of the Mechanical Properties of Flexible Connectors for Use in Insulated Concrete Wall Panels
05:26

Determination of the Mechanical Properties of Flexible Connectors for Use in Insulated Concrete Wall Panels

Published on: October 19, 2022

1.6K
Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms
10:41

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved Non-model Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

9.2K
CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing
08:23

CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing

Published on: November 1, 2024

594

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Qualitative Research
  • Social Practice Theory

Background:

  • Competence Committees (CCs) rely on documented trainee performance.
  • Undocumented contributions (informal, unrecorded data) may influence CC decisions.
  • Understanding the role of undocumented contributions is crucial for effective trainee assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the use of undocumented contributions by CCs in postgraduate training.
  • To explore how informal data interacts with formal documentation in performance evaluation.
  • To compare the use of undocumented contributions in more procedural versus less procedural medical specialties.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative multiple case study design.
  • Observations of CC meetings and semi-structured interviews with CC members.
  • Analysis of conversations structured into lead-up, undocumented contribution, and follow-up, with thick descriptions of undocumented contributions.

Main Results:

  • Undocumented contributions did not replace or override formal documentation.
  • The less procedural (LP) CC used more undocumented contributions (22 instances) than the more procedural (MP) CC (6 instances).
  • Divergent CC orientations (advising/guiding vs. evaluation-focused) and professional experience influenced the use and interpretation of undocumented contributions, often prompted by documentation gaps or discrepancies.

Conclusions:

  • Undocumented contributions often support efforts to ground decisions in available documentation.
  • Nuanced approaches to documentation in CC practices and policies are encouraged.
  • Further analysis of specific cases illustrates the contextual significance of undocumented contributions.