Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Simultaneous Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: April 27, 2014
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation in the initial weeks post-stroke: a pilot randomized study.
Marcela Tengler Carvalho Takahashi1, Joana Bisol Balardin2, Paulo Rodrigo Bazán2
1Hospital Municipal da Vila Santa Catarina Dr. Gilson Cássia Marques de Carvalho ; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein,São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) did not significantly improve upper limb motor function or connectivity in stroke patients. Early post-stroke tDCS did not show clear clinical benefits despite some changes in brain connectivity.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Neurology
Background:
- Stroke frequently causes upper limb motor impairment.
- Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is being investigated as a potential therapy to enhance motor recovery.
- Understanding the effects of tDCS on motor pathways and clinical outcomes is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess changes in upper limb motor function and brain connectivity after cathodal tDCS in early post-stroke patients.
- To compare the effects of active tDCS versus sham stimulation on motor impairment and neural connectivity.
Main Methods:
- Thirteen early post-stroke patients received six sessions of either active or sham cathodal tDCS targeting the primary motor cortex.
- Upper limb motor impairment was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA).
- Resting-state functional connectivity between primary motor cortices and within the unaffected hemisphere's motor network was analyzed.
Main Results:
- More participants in the sham group achieved clinically relevant FMA improvements (≥9 points) than in the active group.
- No statistically significant differences in FMA score changes or connectivity modifications were found between the active and sham groups.
- Increased connectivity between primary motor cortices was observed in more participants receiving active tDCS, but this did not correlate with greater clinical improvement.
Conclusions:
- Early post-stroke application of cathodal tDCS did not yield significant clinical benefits in upper limb motor function.
- Enhanced neural connectivity observed with active tDCS did not translate into superior motor performance compared to sham stimulation.
- Further research with larger cohorts is needed to elucidate the mechanisms and optimize the use of tDCS for stroke rehabilitation.
More Related Videos
13:56The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism
Published on: November 19, 2014
14:56The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb
Published on: September 23, 2018